XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| harsh stage | 07/04/25 | | magical tattoo crackhouse | 07/04/25 | | Cream forum | 07/04/25 | | kink-friendly gas station | 07/04/25 | | harsh stage | 07/04/25 | | vigorous hell hissy fit | 07/04/25 | | magical tattoo crackhouse | 07/04/25 | | vigorous hell hissy fit | 07/04/25 | | magical tattoo crackhouse | 07/04/25 | | vigorous hell hissy fit | 07/04/25 | | magical tattoo crackhouse | 07/05/25 | | harsh stage | 07/05/25 | | dashing turdskin | 07/05/25 | | harsh stage | 07/06/25 | | dashing turdskin | 07/05/25 | | harsh stage | 07/05/25 | | dashing turdskin | 07/06/25 | | Laughsome grizzly stage antidepressant drug | 07/06/25 | | vibrant garrison | 07/05/25 | | Opaque business firm | 07/06/25 | | vibrant garrison | 07/06/25 | | vigorous hell hissy fit | 07/06/25 | | vibrant garrison | 07/06/25 | | vigorous hell hissy fit | 07/06/25 | | mint provocative address codepig | 07/05/25 | | angry marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | Swashbuckling House Patrolman | 07/05/25 | | trip incel church building | 07/06/25 | | vigorous hell hissy fit | 07/06/25 | | Aphrodisiac coldplay fan | 07/06/25 | | vigorous hell hissy fit | 07/06/25 | | Impertinent feces | 07/06/25 | | harsh stage | 07/06/25 | | harsh stage | 07/06/25 | | harsh stage | 07/06/25 | | Laughsome grizzly stage antidepressant drug | 07/06/25 | | harsh stage | 07/06/25 | | Opaque business firm | 07/06/25 | | harsh stage | 07/06/25 | | Aphrodisiac coldplay fan | 07/06/25 | | angry marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | vigorous hell hissy fit | 07/06/25 | | concupiscible flushed hospital pozpig | 07/06/25 | | histrionic fuchsia sanctuary double fault | 07/06/25 | | motley mental disorder dysfunction | 07/06/25 | | histrionic fuchsia sanctuary double fault | 07/06/25 | | multi-colored pearly step-uncle's house associate | 07/06/25 | | vibrant garrison | 07/06/25 | | Cowardly Swollen Cruise Ship | 07/06/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: vigorous hell hissy fit
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: vigorous hell hissy fit
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: vigorous hell hissy fit
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: vigorous hell hissy fit
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: trip incel church building
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Laughsome grizzly stage antidepressant drug
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: angry marketing idea
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49076800) |
|
|