\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but th...
irate forum
  12/06/25
I wouldn't.
underhanded hall dingle berry
  12/06/25
great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really&quo...
Cordovan philosopher-king
  12/06/25
Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"
underhanded hall dingle berry
  12/06/25
...
Trip juggernaut
  12/06/25
pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and y...
cerebral indecent private investor property
  12/06/25
People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge to...
irate forum
  12/06/25
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including ...
cerebral indecent private investor property
  12/06/25
...
Sinister rigor
  12/06/25
...
Sinister rigor
  12/06/25
use "unserious" instead
Vibrant set mother
  12/06/25
could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs
Cordovan philosopher-king
  12/06/25
Nonsensical
underhanded hall dingle berry
  12/06/25
"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"
multi-colored sepia yarmulke library
  12/06/25
"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g...
cerebral indecent private investor property
  12/06/25
"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh w...
multi-colored sepia yarmulke library
  12/06/25
that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. b...
cerebral indecent private investor property
  12/07/25
Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no be...
multi-colored sepia yarmulke library
  12/07/25
Seems cheap
Snowy mind-boggling mexican area
  12/06/25
wacky
Mint Odious Hunting Ground
  12/06/25
finna make shiz up
underhanded hall dingle berry
  12/06/25
“trooned out”
Mustard nursing home
  12/06/25
frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specio...
cheese-eating free-loading corn cake menage
  12/06/25
the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr
cerebral indecent private investor property
  12/06/25
Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat ou...
irate forum
  12/06/25
Drop a few "Not so."s.
Big-titted pit
  12/06/25
"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."
180 Dun Generalized Bond Sweet Tailpipe
  12/06/25
...
irate forum
  12/06/25
"nigger"
hateful rigpig electric furnace
  12/07/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:29 PM
Author: irate forum

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but that seems clearly over the line.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488467)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:32 PM
Author: underhanded hall dingle berry

I wouldn't.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488479)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:34 PM
Author: Cordovan philosopher-king

great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really" silly, or perhaps "super" silly so they dont get confused.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488493)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: underhanded hall dingle berry

Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488503)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:46 PM
Author: Trip juggernaut



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488525)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: cerebral indecent private investor property

pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and you look worse to the court.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488501)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:47 PM
Author: irate forum

People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge too far.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488531)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM
Author: cerebral indecent private investor property

bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."

there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.

tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488562)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:20 PM
Author: Sinister rigor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488652)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: Sinister rigor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488646)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:48 PM
Author: Vibrant set mother

use "unserious" instead

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488536)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: Cordovan philosopher-king

could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488556)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:58 PM
Author: underhanded hall dingle berry

Nonsensical

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488565)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:02 PM
Author: multi-colored sepia yarmulke library

"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489724)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: cerebral indecent private investor property

"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g. fundamental case that every idiot knows).

recently ACB cited marbury when addressing a KTJ dissent that was absolutely ruthless. that's far more effective and devasting than saying "KTJ's dissent is silly." don't say it's silly, show why it's silly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488570)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:03 PM
Author: multi-colored sepia yarmulke library

"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh when people say that. it could mean a million things. u saying they got the law wrong? applied the facts to the law wrong? etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489727)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: cerebral indecent private investor property

that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. but itt we don't know why candy ride thinks OCs argument is silly so a catch-all is appropriate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49491128)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:10 AM
Author: multi-colored sepia yarmulke library

Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no better than silly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49491145)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:01 PM
Author: Snowy mind-boggling mexican area

Seems cheap

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488572)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:17 PM
Author: Mint Odious Hunting Ground

wacky

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488636)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:18 PM
Author: underhanded hall dingle berry

finna make shiz up

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488642)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: Mustard nursing home

“trooned out”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488651)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: cheese-eating free-loading corn cake menage

frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specious, unsupported by precedent or statute, and should be afforded no weight by the court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488669)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: cerebral indecent private investor property

the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488673)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:23 PM
Author: irate forum

Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat out wrong"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489067)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:27 PM
Author: Big-titted pit

Drop a few "Not so."s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489083)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:28 PM
Author: 180 Dun Generalized Bond Sweet Tailpipe

"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489090)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:33 PM
Author: irate forum



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489103)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:26 AM
Author: hateful rigpig electric furnace

"nigger"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49491178)