\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The smarter AI gets the more pathetic the top human experts look

Especially the way they are trying to preserve their intelle...
laughsome ratface
  02/11/26
cr, I tuned into the news today and the top lawyer in the co...
well-lubricated halford
  02/11/26
even top mathematicians and physicists look like drooling re...
laughsome ratface
  02/11/26
top human expert tp
onyx insane forum keepsake machete
  02/11/26
AI is crap, it still gets basic factual queries wrong regula...
balding double fault deer antler
  02/11/26
this "fact-recall" cope is one of the lowest iq mi...
laughsome ratface
  02/11/26
people are too dumb to really push current llms. they ask i...
hot wonderful depressive
  02/11/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2026 2:02 PM
Author: laughsome ratface

Especially the way they are trying to preserve their intellectual status against AI. It signals the exact opposite. You'll have some human who spent years mastering a sytem of symbolic dominance. Right language, right tone, right affiliations. And yet a machine is parsing contraditions they ignore, synthesizing across disciplines finding insights across fields they've never read. Outperforming them in their own language across more domains they can track. Thats what stings to them and their performative doubt becomes the clearest indicator how threatened they are by all of it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833668&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49663471)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2026 2:05 PM
Author: well-lubricated halford

cr, I tuned into the news today and the top lawyer in the country actually looked retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833668&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49663482)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2026 2:33 PM
Author: laughsome ratface

even top mathematicians and physicists look like drooling retards next to claude 4.6. watch a video of sabine hossenfelder see what she talks about and then ask the same shit to the machine and you tell me who's more intelligent. you need to put on edward witten or the equivalent to get something that looks anywhere comparable to AI levels now

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833668&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49663569)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2026 2:14 PM
Author: onyx insane forum keepsake machete

top human expert tp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833668&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49663516)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2026 2:16 PM
Author: balding double fault deer antler

AI is crap, it still gets basic factual queries wrong regularly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833668&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49663522)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2026 2:31 PM
Author: laughsome ratface

this "fact-recall" cope is one of the lowest iq misunderstandings of what intelligence means in the entire zoo. AI does not have access to a database of "facts". It reconstructs what it "knows" through prediction of pure patterns and structure. Ask the highest iq human in the world random "facts" from the encyclopedia and see how many it gets wrong

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833668&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49663563)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2026 2:51 PM
Author: hot wonderful depressive

people are too dumb to really push current llms. they ask it gotcha trivia questions and then smirk when it makes a mistake.

instead have it explain friston to you and it'll do a way better job than literally anyone

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833668&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49663614)