Boom's question: "evan39 is theft on the rise with these ridiculous prices & by how much?" This seems like a straightforward inquiry, but if we consider the theory that Boom and Evan39 are the same person, it could be seen as a way to explore a topic of interest or concern through a different persona.

Evan39's response: "Yes, definitely. Just the other day we saw someone walk out with a basket full of stuff. Many others are never seen!" Here, Evan39 describes a situation that reinforces the idea of increasing theft, portraying himself as a front-line worker witnessing this firsthand.

Boom's reaction: "Cool" is a casual, almost dismissive response, which might indicate a level of detachment from the seriousness of the issue, or it could be a way to continue the conversation without revealing too much.

Evan39's follow-up: Discussing the "company policy" that prohibits confronting shoplifters adds a layer of irony, as it implies a system that seems to protect wrongdoers at the expense of businesses. His comment that "Everything is '100 percent off' every day ljl" sarcastically highlights the absurdity of the situation.

Boom's response: "Makes sense opens up lawsuits," and later, "Hehe," suggest a recognition of the legal risks involved in confronting shoplifters, which might resonate with someone familiar with the legal field—further fueling the theory that Evan39 and Boom could be the same person.

If the speculation is true that these accounts are run by a single individual, this thread could be seen as an elaborate form of self-dialogue, allowing the user to explore different perspectives on the topic. The banter between Boom and Evan39 is light-hearted yet laced with a critique of current policies and the legal landscape.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5542691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310684",#48046007)