https://x.com/selinawangtv/status/1854968427854635409

Nancy Pelosi to the NYT:  “had the president [Biden] gotten out sooner, there may have been other candidates in the race.”

“The anticipation was that, if the president were to step aside, that there would be an open primary. “

“And as I say, Kamala may have, I think she would have done well in that and been stronger going forward. But we don’t know that. That didn’t happen. We live with what happened. And because the president endorsed Kamala Harris immediately, that really made it almost impossible to have a primary at that time. If it had been much earlier, it would have been different”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5630353&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690",#48311820)

https://x.com/markhalperin/status/1854983834489455097

Yes, despite what the ignorant haters want to say, Biden was not supposed to endorse Harris that first day. In fact, many around the VP didn't want him to endorse out of concern that it was going to hurt her "she's earning the nomination" narrative. After I broke the story, Biden came under enormous pressure to endorse the day he dropped out, and he succumbed to that, deeply setting back the efforts of those who wanted Biden out and someone besides Harris to be the nominee. So when I reported that Biden was getting out and NOT endorsing, it was accurate. Journalists never like their reporting to impact events but, in this case, mine did. And haters gonna hate hate hate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5630353&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690",#48311836)

It's all so delicious

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5630353&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690",#48311839)

LJL. She helped build this me$$ & rode it all the way to the cliff.

Now she’s pretending to be SHOCKED that Biden wasn’t up for the job.

Everyone from the handlers to the media to Obama knew what was happening. They kept him propped up, hoping he’d last just long enough to keep the house of cards from falling.

And now that it’s all cracking, she’s scrambling to save face—blame Biden!

Let’s be real: Biden isn’t the tragedy here. It’s the $y$tem that used him up and spit him out, while they kept selling us the same tired lies.

Fuck it all.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5630353&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690",#48312054)

I'm extremely confused at this point. Here's what I have been able to piece together regarding "The Evolving Liberal Position(TM)" on this issue according to the (((MSM))):

- Up until July 2024, it was A HORRIBLE ACT OF DISGUSTING AND BIGOTED AGEISM THAT HAS NO PLACE IN POLITE SOCIETY to suggest that maybe there are valid concerns about senility and declining mental acuity in old people wielding positions of political power in America.

- Then, suddenly, from July 2024 up until just a few days ago, things shifted dramatically, and it became TOTALLY VALID AND IN FACT IMPERATIVE FOR ENGAGED CITIZENS TO ACTIVELY QUESTION whether maybe there are valid concerns about senility and declining mental acuity in old people wielding positions of political power in America (albeit, any such concerns about our current sitting POTUS definitely didn't rise to a level where we needed to start having an active discussion about potentially removing him from the office, just to be clear).

- But now, once again and just within the last day or two, it seems like it might have reverted back to being A HORRIBLE ACT OF DISGUSTING AND BIGOTED AGEISM THAT HAS NO PLACE IN POLITE SOCIETY to suggest that maybe there are valid concerns about senility and declining mental acuity in old people wielding positions of political power in America (not sure yet, but I'm definitely sensing a possible vibe shift in the air as criticism starts to increase re Pelosi in the wake of Kamala's big loss on Tuesday night, so we'll have to keep a close eye on this moving forward in order to avoid becoming terrible bigots IMO)

Libs, can you explain what is causing these huge shifts on this issue? Admittedly I'm completely fucking retarded so there might very well be an obvious legitimate explanation that I'm just not grasping, but surely I'm not the only one who is slightly confused by all of this...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5630353&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690",#48312157)

it was caricature like

if trump pardons hunter etc for some tradeoff then they 100% colluded to fuck with obongo et al

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5630353&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690",#48312953)