jackson dissents alone! maga!
| UN peacekeeper | 03/31/26 | | .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,...., | 03/31/26 | | UhOh | 03/31/26 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 03/31/26 | | peeface | 03/31/26 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 03/31/26 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 03/31/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 31st, 2026 1:11 PM
Author: .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,....,
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2038987647264207233?s=61
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690#49783280) |
Date: March 31st, 2026 1:27 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Kagan:
The same may well be true of content-based but viewpoint-neutral laws regulating speech in doctors’ and counselors’ offices.*
——————
*JUSTICE JACKSON’s dissenting opinion claims that this is a small, or even nonexistent, category. See post, at 21–22, n. 8. But even her own opinion, when listing laws supposedly put at risk today, offers quite a few examples. See post, at 32–33, and n. 13. Her view to the contrary rests on reimagining—and in that way collapsing—the well-settled distinction between viewpoint-based and other content-based speech restrictions. See, e.g., Vidal v. Elster, 602 U. S. 286, 292–293 (2024) (explaining the difference).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690#49783328) |
 |
Date: March 31st, 2026 1:35 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
dat "supposedly" was a nice dig.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690#49783369) |
Date: March 31st, 2026 1:30 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
earlier this week, the majority was 7-0 and Soto and Jackson would only concur in the judgment.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310690#49783339) |
|
|