CA/NV Shitlawer Sued Stores For Making Him Mask, Declared A Vexatious Litigant
| ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 01/27/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:02 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
wonder what this guy's moniker is:
https://ournevadajudges.com/assets/docs/documents/874-vexatious-litigant-order.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622885) |
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:03 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
27. T. Matthew Phillips v. Joshua Booth, et al., Eighth Judicial District Court Case
No. A-24-899003-C (Case No. “A899003”)
On August 2, 2024, Mr. Phillips sued multiple medical service providers. Mr. Phillips
alleged he entered an urgent care facility in August 2022 and was given a facemask but was not
asked to wear it or warned that failure to wear the facemask would result in a denial of services.
Mr. Phillips did not wear the facemask and was asked to leave the premises. Mr. Phillips asked to
speak with someone in charge because he “was anxious to address his pressing medical
condition.” (Case No. A899003, Doc. ID# 1 at para. 23). Mr. Phillips advised the staff “he is an
attorney and knows his rights.” (Id.) The staff member threatened to call the police if Mr.
Phillips did not leave immediately. (Id.) Mr. Phillips later spoke with other facility
representatives, but they “validated the facemasking policy” of the private facility. (Id. at para.
26). Mr. Phillips filed suit for discrimination, naming the facility, the facility receptionist, a
facility nurse, and the two representatives he spoke with who “validated the facemasking policy.”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622887) |
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:05 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
n December 2, 2020, Mr. Phillips sued the grocery store he frequented during the
pandemic because “on each visit, Plaintiff was confronted by Smith’s employees who
aggressively insisted that he wear a facemask.” (Case A825730, Doc. ID# 1 at para. 7). Mr.
Phillips alleged he was exempt from face masking requirements but the Smith’s employees
“ejected Plaintiff and called (or threatened to call) 911—to extort Plaintiff into facemask
compliance.” (Id.). Mr. Phillips also alleged that, because Smith’s enlisted the assistance of local
police, such “means the businesses have enlisted the police as ‘thugs for capitalism.’” (Id. at
para. 30).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622894) |
 |
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:05 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
>enlisted the police as ‘thugs for capitalism
srs this guy must poast
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622896) |
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:06 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
On March 8, 2022, Mr. Phillips filed suit against the Casa Don Juan restaurant, its general
manager, and shift manager. (Case A849331, Doc ID# 1). Mr. Phillips alleged that he and a
guest visited the restaurant (in Jan. 2022) and were asked to wear a facemask. (Id. at para. 14).
Mr. Phillips declined and instead offered a “makeshift” alternative by covering his nose and
mouth with his jacket, which the greeter declined. (Id. at para. 17). Mr. Phillips spoke with the
manager who explained that the restaurant would be fined by OSHA unless patrons wore a mask.
(Id. at para. 18). A compromise was reached where Mr. Phillips and guest were allowed to dine
at an outdoor table. (Id. at para. 20). “After a few minutes of reflection,” Mr. Phillips left
because he feared the restaurant employees “would spit in the food” even though, as he admits in
his complaint, “[n]o employees threatened to do this.” (Id. at para. 21).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622898) |
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:06 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
In an April 16, 2019, email to attorney Wilson, Mr. Phillips wrote, “Dealing with you and
your client is impossible. Which explains why this litigation—and the soon-to-be-filed ‘spin off’
litigations—will likely last 3 or 4 years. You will never give a straight answer. You are hardwired to be deceptive. You should be a lawyer!! Oh, wait…”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622901) |
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:10 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
Judge Henderson also found that Mr. Phillips’s conduct in this case demonstrated he was
“on a crusade to constantly be determined to be ‘right’, and that everyone else involved is corrupt,
etc.” and that Mr. Phillips’s “approach is an obsession, or even an addiction”; he “invariably
insists that he must be declared totally right as to every argument he ever made, and that anyone
else involved must not only be declared as totally wrong, but they must be harshly punished, and
even essentially annihilated . . . .” (Id. at 4:13-5:6).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622904)
|
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:11 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
Judge Henderson’s findings continued: “[M]ost [of Mr. Phillips’s] filings are little more
than non-stop personal attacks, name-calling, and for the Court to brand other judges and lawyers,
as well as itself, as being wretched crooks out to violate the constitution at every turn.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622905) |
Date: January 27th, 2026 9:12 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
vid of him:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DizmDTM7qZ4
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5827256&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310734#49622906) |
|
|