The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Laughsome flesh locale becky | 01/06/26 | | zippy jewess | 01/06/26 | | Titillating macaca | 01/06/26 | | zippy jewess | 01/06/26 | | Titillating macaca | 01/06/26 | | zippy jewess | 01/06/26 | | Laughsome flesh locale becky | 01/06/26 | | zippy jewess | 01/06/26 | | Laughsome flesh locale becky | 01/06/26 | | Peach fragrant organic girlfriend | 01/07/26 | | Lilac nowag | 01/06/26 | | Maize swashbuckling center | 01/06/26 | | Titillating macaca | 01/06/26 | | Appetizing impressive piazza foreskin | 01/06/26 | | Titillating macaca | 01/06/26 | | stirring cordovan international law enforcement agency | 01/06/26 | | vigorous striped hyena church | 01/06/26 | | swollen wine alpha turdskin | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: zippy jewess
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310751",#49568134) |
|
|