Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?
| tantric doctorate | 12/06/25 | | well-lubricated rose stage | 12/06/25 | | dun stead mad cow disease | 12/06/25 | | well-lubricated rose stage | 12/06/25 | | Poppy halford home | 12/06/25 | | motley parlor private investor | 12/06/25 | | tantric doctorate | 12/06/25 | | motley parlor private investor | 12/06/25 | | buff range haunted graveyard | 12/06/25 | | buff range haunted graveyard | 12/06/25 | | Racy puce elastic band | 12/06/25 | | dun stead mad cow disease | 12/06/25 | | well-lubricated rose stage | 12/06/25 | | massive hell pervert | 12/06/25 | | motley parlor private investor | 12/06/25 | | massive hell pervert | 12/06/25 | | motley parlor private investor | 12/07/25 | | massive hell pervert | 12/07/25 | | stirring library | 12/06/25 | | Burgundy Garrison | 12/06/25 | | well-lubricated rose stage | 12/06/25 | | fiercely-loyal cracking goal in life skinny woman | 12/06/25 | | Idiotic Lascivious Point Half-breed | 12/06/25 | | motley parlor private investor | 12/06/25 | | tantric doctorate | 12/06/25 | | adventurous charcoal goyim | 12/06/25 | | umber place of business | 12/06/25 | | tantric doctorate | 12/06/25 | | Sapphire judgmental meetinghouse fortuitous meteor | 12/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM Author: motley parlor private investor
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."
there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.
tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310751",#49488562) |
|
|