The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| claret kitchen partner | 01/06/26 | | deep shrine headpube | 01/06/26 | | dun domesticated lodge bbw | 01/06/26 | | deep shrine headpube | 01/06/26 | | dun domesticated lodge bbw | 01/06/26 | | deep shrine headpube | 01/06/26 | | claret kitchen partner | 01/06/26 | | deep shrine headpube | 01/06/26 | | claret kitchen partner | 01/06/26 | | Floppy Fluffy Boltzmann | 01/07/26 | | bateful lemon ceo water buffalo | 01/06/26 | | Sable trump supporter | 01/06/26 | | dun domesticated lodge bbw | 01/06/26 | | Trip business firm | 01/06/26 | | dun domesticated lodge bbw | 01/06/26 | | Orchid charismatic pozpig turdskin | 01/06/26 | | Aphrodisiac cordovan deer antler corner | 01/06/26 | | hyperactive soul-stirring stead voyeur | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: deep shrine headpube
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310751",#49568134) |
|
|