\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
deep boyish community account becky
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
sienna slimy menage friendly grandma
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
deep boyish community account becky
  11/29/25
...
Soggy swashbuckling filthpig
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
appetizing mildly autistic ceo idiot
  11/29/25
lol jfc
deep boyish community account becky
  11/29/25
...
Cream travel guidebook garrison
  11/29/25
wow
Jet Disturbing Field Dopamine
  12/07/25
lmao
Mentally impaired state
  12/07/25
...
Cream travel guidebook garrison
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
Jet Disturbing Field Dopamine
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
Mustard degenerate stock car
  12/07/25
Mental illness
hyperventilating green striped hyena senate
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
aphrodisiac mahogany piazza persian
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
sienna slimy menage friendly grandma
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
Puce shrine trust fund
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
Soggy swashbuckling filthpig
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: deep boyish community account becky

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: sienna slimy menage friendly grandma

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: deep boyish community account becky

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: Soggy swashbuckling filthpig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: appetizing mildly autistic ceo idiot

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: deep boyish community account becky

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: Cream travel guidebook garrison



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Jet Disturbing Field Dopamine

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: Mentally impaired state

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: Cream travel guidebook garrison



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: Jet Disturbing Field Dopamine

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: Mustard degenerate stock car

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: hyperventilating green striped hyena senate

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: aphrodisiac mahogany piazza persian

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: sienna slimy menage friendly grandma

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: Puce shrine trust fund

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: Soggy swashbuckling filthpig

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49527743)