\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

New York to ban AI for legal and medical advice

A bill under consideration by the New York state legislature...
Elite violent temple
  03/05/26
nice let's (((((((legally))))))) ban the only pro-social and...
adventurous stead
  03/05/26
...
Duck-like provocative step-uncle's house
  03/05/26
Good. Fuck job-killing AI.
Haunting big site marketing idea
  03/05/26
anyone who uses microsoft word for their "job" sho...
onyx titillating hospital national security agency
  03/05/26
I'm assuming you live in a building that still has an elevat...
Odious offensive pit weed whacker
  03/05/26
*redlines “expand access to legal advice, no higher fe...
Razzle national
  03/05/26
Lmao this isn’t going to do shit. No one thinks they&r...
dashing pocket flask dopamine
  03/05/26
Lmao they Chair of Internet and Technology probably some 75 ...
dashing pocket flask dopamine
  03/05/26
...
angry faggotry
  03/05/26
good
stimulating alcoholic ceo
  03/05/26
So is a treasure. The fact you of all people don’t see...
dashing pocket flask dopamine
  03/05/26
what
stimulating alcoholic ceo
  03/05/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:14 PM
Author: Elite violent temple

A bill under consideration by the New York state legislature would prohibit artificial intelligence-powered chatbots from providing legal or medical advice, and it would allow users to sue chatbot owners who violate the ban.

Senate Bill S7263, introduced last session, advanced out of the Internet and Technology Committee last Wednesday on a 6–0 vote as part of a package of bills that seek to regulate AI chatbots. The bill targets AI chatbots that impersonate licensed professionals — such as doctors and lawyers — and bars them from providing “substantive response, information, or advice” that would violate professional licensing laws or constitute the unauthorized practice of law.

It also mandates that chatbot owners provide “clear, conspicuous, and explicit” notice to users that they are interacting with an AI system, with the notice displayed in the same language as the chatbot and in a readable font size. However, the bill clarifies that this notice for users, which indicates that they are interacting with a non-human system does, not absolve the chatbot owners of liability.

And thanks to the bill’s private right of action, users would be able bring civil lawsuits against chatbot owners, to recover damages and attorney’s fees. The private right of action is considered a key enforcement tool, and experts have argued that laws governing data or AI systems can be weaker without it. Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey recently wrote that the mechanism provides a “significant deterrent effect.”

If passed, the law will take effect 90 days after being signed by the governor. Other bills in the legislative package include a measure to protect minors from unsafe features in chatbots, and regulating certain online platforms, like the gaming platform Roblox, that have weak privacy protections for minors. Others include a mandate for notices on generative AI systems and new rules for the handling of biometric data and “synthetic content creations.”

The bill’s author, state Sen. Kristen Gonzalez, who also chairs the technology committee, said that the package was meant to ensure that AI innovation “doesn’t come at the expense of New Yorkers’ safety, especially our kids.” In January, the free generative AI chatbot app Character.AI and Google settled several lawsuits pertaining to the role their chatbots played in the suicides of several minors.

“As Chair of the Internet & Technology Committee, I’m proud of the agenda we passed today,” Gonzalez said in a news release last week. “People deserve real care from real people. They deserve transparency, accountability, and the promise that their data is secure while utilizing technology.”



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49717895)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:15 PM
Author: adventurous stead

nice let's (((((((legally))))))) ban the only pro-social and positive use case of AI

thank you, (((((((law))))))), very cool!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49717897)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:41 PM
Author: Duck-like provocative step-uncle's house



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49718013)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:16 PM
Author: Haunting big site marketing idea

Good. Fuck job-killing AI.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49717909)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:19 PM
Author: onyx titillating hospital national security agency

anyone who uses microsoft word for their "job" should consider getting a real one

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49717921)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:42 PM
Author: Odious offensive pit weed whacker

I'm assuming you live in a building that still has an elevator operator? You know, because youre so principled?

And you get all your clothes washed by hand, too, rather than using a job killing washing machine?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49718016)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:17 PM
Author: Razzle national

*redlines “expand access to legal advice, no higher fees!” to “expand access to legal advice? no, higher fees!”*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49717910)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:21 PM
Author: dashing pocket flask dopamine

Lmao this isn’t going to do shit. No one thinks they’re talking to a real lawyer when talking to ChatGPT. Lawyers will just use that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49717928)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:22 PM
Author: dashing pocket flask dopamine

Lmao they Chair of Internet and Technology probably some 75 year old lawyer who still looks up addresses in the red book.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49717933)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:37 PM
Author: angry faggotry



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49718006)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:40 PM
Author: stimulating alcoholic ceo

good

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49718012)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:42 PM
Author: dashing pocket flask dopamine

So is a treasure. The fact you of all people don’t see this with your displayed “porn tastes” on this board is eye opening.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49718017)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2026 1:42 PM
Author: stimulating alcoholic ceo

what

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5841900&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49718019)