The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
I wonder how the F35s will fair if we attack Iran
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 20th, 2019 4:33 PM Author: arousing lilac yarmulke I'm prepared to be disappointed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#38416981) |
Date: June 20th, 2019 4:35 PM Author: Cocky faggotry Zero. They'll just use standoff weapons. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#38416994) |
 |
Date: June 20th, 2019 4:50 PM Author: arousing lilac yarmulke When do you think they will ever be used? I'm skeptical that they're even effective. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#38417044) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2019 4:53 PM Author: Glassy Jewess Piazza Depends on what you mean by effective.
They are just stealthy flying platforms for the best radars known to man. The speed, maneuverability or even range of an aircraft doesn't matter when you can fire a missile at a target before the enemy even knows you're there. |
|
Date: June 20th, 2019 5:00 PM Author: arousing lilac yarmulke Maybe what I meant to say was I expect some embarrassing technical defect. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#38417103) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2019 5:02 PM Author: Concupiscible Fishy Rigpig Tank Military gets around that problem by flying them with half their features disabled. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#38417109) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 8:53 AM Author: Glassy Jewess Piazza I think we know all of its flaws by now. It's easily the most scrutinized product ever designed at this point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#38419775) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 8:58 AM Author: hot corn cake The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unreported F-35 ... DefenseNews.com-Jun 12, 2019 WASHINGTON — Over the past several years, U.S. Defense Department leaders have gone from citing technical problems as their biggest ... |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 9:06 AM Author: Glassy Jewess Piazza When I said "we" I meant the US military. Of course they're not going to tell us about all of the fighter's limitations. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#38419796) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 9:09 AM Author: hot corn cake It's easily the most scrutinized product ever designed at this point.
Looked like you implied the Pentagon had already figured its flaws. |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 9:20 AM Author: Glassy Jewess Piazza Oh definitely not.
It's an inherently flawed plane. The moment they tried to take one design and make an carrier capable fighter, a VTOL fighter and a standard air superiority fighter it was doomed. |
|
Date: June 24th, 2019 12:55 AM Author: Concupiscible Fishy Rigpig Tank https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/f-35-flaw-even-fixable-63797 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#38430995) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 9:10 AM Author: talented lodge knife *ahem*
“fare” |
|
Date: March 1st, 2026 5:18 AM Author: incel adams Pretty well turns out (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49704512) |
|
Date: March 1st, 2026 5:29 AM Author: fatty nigger (✅🍑) Huh. Yeah. Turns out the stealth thing is not a ruse. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310752#49704515) |