art valuation experts get itt
| impertinent rigpig theater stage | 12/04/25 | | beady-eyed chocolate tanning salon twinkling uncleanness | 12/04/25 | | impertinent rigpig theater stage | 12/04/25 | | beady-eyed chocolate tanning salon twinkling uncleanness | 12/04/25 | | Glassy Blathering Telephone Lodge | 12/04/25 | | impertinent rigpig theater stage | 12/04/25 | | razzmatazz therapy | 12/04/25 | | Vibrant milky garrison | 12/04/25 | | impertinent rigpig theater stage | 12/04/25 | | Bonkers deer antler | 12/04/25 | | impertinent rigpig theater stage | 12/04/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 4th, 2025 9:15 AM Author: impertinent rigpig theater stage
what's generally considered more valuable
- an original work of a famous person/artist?
- a famous person/artist doing their own replica of highly famous painting?
does signed / unsigned matter assuming the piece comes with authentication?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806066&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764",#49482715) |
Date: December 4th, 2025 6:38 PM Author: impertinent rigpig theater stage
shows how stupid this board is when it comes to arttt
the van gogh replica went for 8k+ and the matisse rep went for 17k+
lol, the 1990's seiko quartz diver went for 21k+
i consider winning my lot of 3 nm landscapes (1 signed) for $4.3k all in with hammer fees to be a steal.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806066&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764",#49484333) |
|
|