The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
TRUMP DOJ secures warrant against Don Lemon
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 22nd, 2026 4:50 PM Author: Adulterous house-broken forum yarmulke Whoops, I guess i typed too fast. I meant to say, "Judge FUCKING REJECTS Trump DOJ's attempt indict Don Lemon"
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/22/don-lemon-minnesota-protest-not-charged
"Judge declines to sign off on charges against former CNN anchor Don Lemon
Refusal to approve charges against Lemon in connection with Minnesota protest reportedly ‘enraged’ Pam Bondi" |
Date: January 22nd, 2026 4:54 PM Author: dark station i've been skeptical of the theory against Lemon. what did he do that warrants arrest? the arrest of the interruptors is easy to justify.
still, if you would, give me the name of the Magistrate Judge who denied the request. and tell if that very Magistrate was on record saying he wanted to oppose Trump. |
 |
Date: January 25th, 2026 6:13 PM Author: at-the-ready hairraiser sex offender you've been skeptical of it? could it be because it's a fucking joke just like 99% of the weaponized prosecutions of this administration? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618251) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 7:10 PM Author: dark station he was running around uninvited as part of a group that was clearly interrupting the service -- which was a clear crime.
i'm skeptical because i assume the federal courts will grant a journalist some latitude unless he was a ring leader or was particularly aggressive. |
|
Date: January 22nd, 2026 4:55 PM Author: Swashbuckling pocket flask school cafeteria https://ibb.co/ycsBDH6t (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49609660) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 6:03 PM Author: dark station can some crim law masterman explain this? Harmeet says COA says there *was* PC to arrest Don Lemon but the court declines to order the magistrate to sign the warrant.
https://x.com/AAGDhillon/status/2015140496344314364 |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 6:07 PM Author: Razzmatazz cuck idiot only the lone dissenting member of the panel said there was PC and he’s a MAGA asshat, not a real judge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618230) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 6:49 PM Author: dark station i should have clicked thru to the sources and i'm very disappointed in Harmeet (who in my prior experience had been precise and accurate in her claims). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618359) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 9:31 PM Author: Razzmatazz cuck idiot brother they’re all lying sacks of shit. there are no good ones (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618884) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 6:14 PM Author: at-the-ready hairraiser sex offender (takes legal advice from Harmeet) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618252) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 6:37 PM Author: milky queen of the night (JD, Fordham University) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618311) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 6:46 PM Author: dark station yeah i posted too quickly because i was watching football and didn't click thru (like i should have) to the underlying sources. *grows a beard* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618348) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 6:52 PM Author: dark station the ruling.
https://x.com/EWess92/status/2015133450869846256/photo/1 |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 7:13 PM Author: milky queen of the night lol@ that retarded bot account (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618452) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 8:19 PM Author: dark station he's followed by Harmeet, Orin Kerr, and William Baude. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618692) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 8:34 PM Author: milky queen of the night Yeah and "he" gets retweeted by Eugene Kontorovich and Adrian Vermeule. I noticed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618739) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 7:17 PM Author: Unholy red volcanic crater locus 🍋 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618471) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 7:18 PM Author: milky queen of the night ljl, can any cons elaborate on this "clear error" doctrine? I didn't go to University of Chicago, so I thought "abuse of discretion" was the customary standard of review for these things
https://x.com/i/status/2015135401066020902 |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 8:36 PM Author: milky queen of the night Anyone? I'm sure the fabulous legal scholar Eric W. isn't a shithead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618743) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 8:32 PM Author: dark station looks like the 8th ruled that DOJ has another avenue -- asking the USDC judge below to reject the Magistrate's ruling, so the DOJ's request for appellate relief is premature.
one of the appellate judges wanted to let the court below know that he sees an easy PC issue. who knows if the other two appellate judges see it that way.
the presiding judge below, Schiltz, was dealing with his mentally disabled kid when DOJ asked for a quick reversal of the Magistrate judge's decision.
|
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 8:40 PM Author: milky queen of the night cr, the government's right obtain search warrants is preserved by this decision. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618752) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 9:41 PM Author: Adulterous house-broken forum yarmulke lol @ getting the District Court overrule the Mag.
I've had cases where the Mag CLEARLY misstated the law, and the District Judge still followed his ruling by saying that the error was "Harmless". |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 9:45 PM Author: milky queen of the night I've heard there's a presumption of innocence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618911) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 9:46 PM Author: Adulterous house-broken forum yarmulke It's a presumption of "This case is fucking dumb and I don't want it in my court" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618915) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 9:47 PM Author: Razzmatazz cuck idiot it’s easy to imagine scenarios where that’s the correct ruling (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49618917) |
|
Date: January 25th, 2026 10:53 PM Author: dark station do you happen to the standard of review on appeal if the USDC judge declines to overrule the magistrate? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49619096) |
|
Date: January 26th, 2026 1:17 PM Author: Adulterous house-broken forum yarmulke lol, yeah it's "Appellant can get fucked! FedBros4Life!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49620519) |
|
Date: January 26th, 2026 1:24 PM Author: milky queen of the night Rubber stamp doctrine kicks in at that point. The magistrate has to do whatever the cops want (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5825149&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49620553) |