What’s worse is the silence around her actual GPA, conveniently scrubbed from public view as if we’re not allowed to ask. Isn’t it telling? The intellectual beacon of progress can’t even be transparent about her grades—because the truth is, they’re embarrassing. This is the woman who’s supposed to steer the ship of democracy in its most fragile moment, yet she couldn’t even navigate law school without stumbling into mediocrity.

But the narrative insists we ignore this. That UC Hastings diploma is waved around like it’s a golden ticket, but for what? It’s a second-rate law school for third-rate lawyers. And what did Kamala do with that degree? She failed the bar exam on her first attempt, a detail that’s glossed over in her story of "perseverance." In reality, it’s a red flag that no one wants to acknowledge. This is the person who’s meant to safeguard democracy—someone who couldn’t even clear the basic hurdle of professional competence on the first try. What a Joke.

The tragedy is that we’re expected to take this seriously. We’re told that she’s a "champion of the people," a legal scholar of consequence, yet her academic record is one of unimpressive stumbles. If this is the best we can do, if this is the person tasked with saving democracy, what does that say about us? That we’re willing to elevate mediocrity, to place a careerist with a subpar GPA into the highest echelons of power, while pretending it doesn’t matter?

Kamala’s GPA is more than a number—it’s a reflection of her entire political career: smoke, mirrors, and a relentless cover-up of her intellectual shortcomings. UC Hastings, the failed bar exam, the buried GPA—it all tells the same story. She’s not brilliant. She’s not even competent. And yet here we are, watching her ascend, as if mediocrity hasn’t already done enough damage to this country.

—borders

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5611849&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#48199289)