\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
olive stead
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
Peach idea he suggested
  12/08/25
You know how
Pale stubborn filthpig
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
olive stead
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
Hairless bearded boistinker
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
olive stead
  12/08/25
...
Hairless bearded boistinker
  12/08/25
180
Titillating base
  12/09/25
...
mischievous diverse wrinkle step-uncle's house
  12/09/25
correct
Sepia dashing area circlehead
  12/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: olive stead

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Peach idea he suggested

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Pale stubborn filthpig

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: olive stead

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: Hairless bearded boistinker

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: olive stead

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: Hairless bearded boistinker



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: Titillating base

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: mischievous diverse wrinkle step-uncle's house



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: Sepia dashing area circlehead

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#49495777)