Theory: the reason the West vaulted past China was the alphabet.
| sick knife | 03/31/12 | | lascivious impertinent toaster | 03/31/12 | | Umber faggotry | 03/31/12 | | adventurous codepig indirect expression | 03/31/12 | | sick knife | 03/31/12 | | adventurous codepig indirect expression | 03/31/12 | | odious soggy house weed whacker | 03/31/12 | | disrespectful parlour azn | 03/04/25 | | Charismatic chestnut main people | 03/31/12 | | insane mahogany selfie corner | 03/31/12 | | Stirring indian lodge roommate | 03/31/12 | | Motley school cafeteria french chef | 03/31/12 | | Abnormal cruise ship | 03/31/12 | | wine cuckoldry idiot | 03/31/12 | | Maroon Institution Shitlib | 03/31/12 | | obsidian supple police squad | 03/31/12 | | trip flirting rigor | 03/31/12 | | Cordovan School | 03/04/25 | | Don Spaceporn De La Squancha | 08/14/26 | | Underhanded Razzle Stage | 03/31/12 | | trip flirting rigor | 03/31/12 | | henna beady-eyed organic girlfriend patrolman | 03/31/12 | | sick knife | 03/31/12 | | wine cuckoldry idiot | 03/31/12 | | Sadistic fiercely-loyal bawdyhouse prole | 03/31/12 | | sick knife | 03/31/12 | | Underhanded Razzle Stage | 03/31/12 | | Sadistic fiercely-loyal bawdyhouse prole | 03/31/12 | | multi-colored apoplectic doctorate internal respiration | 03/31/12 | | adventurous codepig indirect expression | 03/31/12 | | vigorous gunner fanboi | 03/31/12 | | glittery den | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | glittery den | 03/31/12 | | Underhanded Razzle Stage | 03/31/12 | | glittery den | 03/31/12 | | Underhanded Razzle Stage | 03/31/12 | | glittery den | 03/31/12 | | Underhanded Razzle Stage | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | Underhanded Razzle Stage | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | Underhanded Razzle Stage | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | Underhanded Razzle Stage | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | glittery den | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | bonkers degenerate | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | glittery den | 03/31/12 | | Umber faggotry | 03/31/12 | | bonkers degenerate | 03/31/12 | | Laughsome multi-billionaire | 03/31/12 | | exciting macaca | 03/31/12 | | infuriating fantasy-prone corn cake | 02/26/25 | | Lilac fortuitous meteor gay wizard | 02/26/25 | | infuriating fantasy-prone corn cake | 02/26/25 | | infuriating fantasy-prone corn cake | 03/03/25 | | nyuug | 08/12/26 | | nyuug | 08/12/26 | | nyuug | 08/13/26 | | nyuug | 08/14/26 | | Dead bbw | 03/03/25 | | topaz slap-happy meetinghouse | 03/03/25 | | fishy sneaky criminal roast beef | 03/04/25 | | ivory wonderful dopamine | 03/04/25 | | ....,.,..,...,..,...........,.........,..... | 08/13/26 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/14/26 | | ....,.,..,...,..,...........,.........,..... | 08/14/26 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 31st, 2012 5:41 PM Author: sick knife
With 24 or so letters, once the technology for the printing press came along, it was much easier to disseminate information that could then be improved upon by anyone who could read. As opposed to a language with a different character for every word. Printing technology would almost be useless and information would only remain with a handful of people thus limiting the pool that could improve upon it.
Just a random thought.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#20356281) |
Date: March 31st, 2012 6:21 PM Author: wine cuckoldry idiot
Ive always wondered this
SLANTEYES - being fluent in both english and your hometown primitive language, is it as easy to be as expressive in your home tongue?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#20356539) |
 |
Date: March 31st, 2012 8:03 PM Author: glittery den
that's a circular argument, though. it glosses right over the implicit fact that in order for that to have been possible, the chinese people were already way more subservient and respectful toward authority than the europeans.
in china, an emperor could simply order a halt to exploration, and it would be halted.
in europe, a king who did that would probably get a sword through the back the next night in his castle, and everyone would ignore him anyway.
that's a cultural difference worth exploring, to say the least.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#20357104) |
 |
Date: March 31st, 2012 8:09 PM Author: Laughsome multi-billionaire
Yes and no. There were peasant rebellions in CHinese history.
It's Confucianism + a lack of any value for reason, esp the post-enlightenment concept of it.
The Chinese see a leader as someone who decides. One viewpoint is always better than many, even if many are seen as fine. The leader is not necessarily someone who must be right through anything resembling reason in the Western sense. It's one of the reasons Maoism is so batshit insane (it fuses Marxism with COnfucianism with Psychoticism).
Their culture is different. Really different.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#20357134)
|
 |
Date: March 31st, 2012 8:11 PM Author: glittery den
CHINESE EMPEROR: Burn the fleet!
CHINESE PEOPLE: Yes, Emperor!
*fleet is burned*
EUROPEAN KING: Burn the fleet!
KING'S SUBJECTS: Fuck off you fucking cunt!
*smashes in king's skull with a mace*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#20357150) |
 |
Date: March 31st, 2012 8:31 PM Author: Laughsome multi-billionaire
They had peasant rebellions too e.g. Yellow Turban.
It's dramatized in Romance of the 3 Kingdoms, if memory serves.
Han is the nearest analogue to the middle ages.
We're all neglecting the fact that Chinese culture is very old.
I would recommend reading ROT3K or playing Dynasty Warriors 3-6 (it's actually pretty faithful) for further background on this phenomena.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#20357271) |
 |
Date: March 31st, 2012 8:31 PM Author: Underhanded Razzle Stage
Nations as opposed to vassalage kingdoms?
The 17th century. The Peace of Westphalia, 1648.
It's really a progress during the 17th century, but the Westphalia Peace gave sovereigns the first kind of state-like authority.
Certainly not at any time before the 1600s, though.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#20357274) |
 |
Date: March 31st, 2012 8:31 PM Author: Laughsome multi-billionaire
Fair. Politically I can't argue with it.
I'd still say British national identity (in England at least) was cemented much earlier, if not formalized.
Kissinger fan?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#20357275) |
Date: February 26th, 2025 9:31 PM Author: infuriating fantasy-prone corn cake
cumskins literally believing korean uses hieroglyphs now LOLLERCAUST
Date: February 26th, 2025 9:28 PM
Author: hank_scorpio
azn's still haven't really discovered writing, they are just using a bunch of hieroglyphs
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5536032&forum_id=2#48697467
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#48697484) |
Date: March 4th, 2025 1:05 AM Author: ivory wonderful dopamine
and the alphabet sucks
why not three dimensional ambigramic characters like a real civilization
barbaric
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1912841&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310764#48712186) |
|
|