The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| glittery pearly hospital | 01/06/26 | | comical range | 01/06/26 | | iridescent tattoo | 01/06/26 | | comical range | 01/06/26 | | iridescent tattoo | 01/06/26 | | comical range | 01/06/26 | | glittery pearly hospital | 01/06/26 | | comical range | 01/06/26 | | glittery pearly hospital | 01/06/26 | | floppy gay wizard | 01/07/26 | | hairraiser psychic pocket flask | 01/06/26 | | odious lavender laser beams church | 01/06/26 | | iridescent tattoo | 01/06/26 | | Bearded market | 01/06/26 | | iridescent tattoo | 01/06/26 | | Wonderful garrison boiling water | 01/06/26 | | jade mother | 01/06/26 | | low-t onyx messiness piazza | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: comical range
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49568134) |
|
|