XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| unhinged bateful cuck | 07/04/25 | | lemon lascivious national security agency | 07/04/25 | | Trip Resort Azn | 07/04/25 | | Buff theatre | 07/04/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/04/25 | | Vivacious abode | 07/04/25 | | lemon lascivious national security agency | 07/04/25 | | Vivacious abode | 07/04/25 | | lemon lascivious national security agency | 07/04/25 | | Vivacious abode | 07/04/25 | | lemon lascivious national security agency | 07/05/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/05/25 | | Spruce Stimulating Masturbator | 07/05/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/06/25 | | Spruce Stimulating Masturbator | 07/05/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/05/25 | | Spruce Stimulating Masturbator | 07/06/25 | | vengeful fighting indian lodge idiot | 07/06/25 | | Flesh Prole Factory Reset Button | 07/05/25 | | nofapping pink corner black woman | 07/06/25 | | Flesh Prole Factory Reset Button | 07/06/25 | | Vivacious abode | 07/06/25 | | Flesh Prole Factory Reset Button | 07/06/25 | | Vivacious abode | 07/06/25 | | Nubile hall | 07/05/25 | | Mind-boggling Pearl Sanctuary | 07/06/25 | | turquoise insecure box office coffee pot | 07/05/25 | | Twisted citrine national | 07/06/25 | | Vivacious abode | 07/06/25 | | Diverse misanthropic space | 07/06/25 | | Vivacious abode | 07/06/25 | | flirting friendly grandma rehab | 07/06/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/06/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/06/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/06/25 | | vengeful fighting indian lodge idiot | 07/06/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/06/25 | | nofapping pink corner black woman | 07/06/25 | | unhinged bateful cuck | 07/06/25 | | Diverse misanthropic space | 07/06/25 | | Mind-boggling Pearl Sanctuary | 07/06/25 | | Vivacious abode | 07/06/25 | | Slap-happy Property Wagecucks | 07/06/25 | | dashing puce private investor | 07/06/25 | | house-broken piazza keepsake machete | 07/06/25 | | dashing puce private investor | 07/06/25 | | Beady-eyed khaki persian | 07/06/25 | | Flesh Prole Factory Reset Button | 07/06/25 | | Magenta shrine | 07/06/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Vivacious abode
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Vivacious abode
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Vivacious abode
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Vivacious abode
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Twisted citrine national
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: vengeful fighting indian lodge idiot
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Mind-boggling Pearl Sanctuary
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49076800) |
|
|