Can Men Get Pregnant?
| Flushed jew property | 05/04/22 | | seedy motley electric furnace | 05/04/22 | | brass bossy stag film | 05/04/22 | | cerise slippery chapel | 05/04/22 | | brass bossy stag film | 05/04/22 | | cerise slippery chapel | 05/04/22 | | odious chartreuse chad | 05/04/22 | | spectacular frum tanning salon | 05/04/22 | | seedy motley electric furnace | 05/04/22 | | citrine orchestra pit degenerate | 05/04/22 | | Cracking Milk | 01/14/26 | | Cracking Milk | 01/14/26 | | Cracking Milk | 01/15/26 | | Cracking Milk | 01/15/26 | | Cracking Milk | 01/19/26 | | Cracking Milk | 01/20/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | nyuug | 01/27/26 | | glassy wonderful garrison | 01/14/26 | | Crystalline native | 01/15/26 | | self-centered autistic rehab | 01/15/26 | | puce resort hairy legs | 01/19/26 | | 6 7 | 01/25/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:28 PM Author: seedy motley electric furnace
"With our understanding constantly evolving, it’s important to honor the fact that one’s gender doesn’t determine whether they can become pregnant. Many men have had children of their own, and many more will likely do so in the future."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#44454608)
|
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:36 PM Author: cerise slippery chapel
“To our knowledge, there has not yet been a case of pregnancy in [a biologically male] individual.”
Is the “to our knowledge” qualifier really necessary here?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#44454641) |
 |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:18 PM Author: Crystalline native
Pregnancy via the abdominal cavity
It has also been suggested that it may be possible for AMAB folks to carry a baby in the abdominal cavity.
People have made this leap based on the fact that a very tiny percentage of eggs are fertilized outside of the uterus in what is known as an ectopic pregnancy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49592650) |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:14 PM Author: self-centered autistic rehab
why won't shitlibs testifying before congress and scotus say what they mean: "man" and "woman" is purely psychological, can be chosen and changed at will by the individual, and is not subject to review. it is objectively meaningless. but then it's an invalid class for the purpose of the law - if you can't define it you can't distinguish it, and if you can't distinguish it you can't protect it. next up: whites start identifying as black on college applications and government contracts.
and why don't republicans just steal their language and define "woman" as "a person with a uterus and ovaries"? or "a person with xx chromosomes?"
this shit is so silly. what a joke of a country.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310796#49592636) |
|
|