RESOLVED: if you prefer skinny women to thicc women, your gay
| Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | Marvelous sanctuary really tough guy | 12/12/25 | | Greedy idea he suggested | 12/12/25 | | nudist dragon | 12/12/25 | | Burgundy giraffe | 12/12/25 | | Underhanded digit ratio | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Chrome lay masturbator | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Chrome lay masturbator | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Cream Psychic | 12/12/25 | | Violet Self-centered Jewess Skinny Woman | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Chrome lay masturbator | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Underhanded digit ratio | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Underhanded digit ratio | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Zombie-like soul-stirring potus | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Zombie-like soul-stirring potus | 12/12/25 | | Chrome lay masturbator | 12/12/25 | | Provocative swollen senate | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | Underhanded digit ratio | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | nudist dragon | 12/12/25 | | bronze business firm | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | razzle house-broken hissy fit | 12/12/25 | | Iridescent degenerate address | 12/12/25 | | hilarious swashbuckling main people dilemma | 12/12/25 | | aromatic shimmering depressive deer antler | 12/12/25 | | Marvelous sanctuary really tough guy | 12/12/25 | | gold appetizing hospital | 12/12/25 | | Cyan impertinent stead fat ankles | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | Cream Psychic | 12/12/25 | | peach market boistinker | 12/12/25 | | Curious circlehead sweet tailpipe | 12/12/25 | | Cerebral garnet institution mood | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | Cream Psychic | 12/12/25 | | Underhanded digit ratio | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | peach market boistinker | 12/12/25 | | Salmon boyish karate | 12/12/25 | | at-the-ready menage | 12/12/25 | | vibrant aqua cumskin | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | impressive public bath | 12/12/25 | | vibrant aqua cumskin | 12/12/25 | | razzle house-broken hissy fit | 12/12/25 | | plum excitant keepsake machete | 12/12/25 | | at-the-ready menage | 12/12/25 | | Salmon boyish karate | 12/12/25 | | Salmon boyish karate | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 | | Salmon boyish karate | 12/12/25 | | at-the-ready menage | 12/12/25 | | Poppy roast beef associate | 12/12/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:48 AM Author: impressive public bath
in 2025 BMI is more a metric for how responsible and diligent a woman is. white people mitigate their primal instincts with rationality. a dindu going off pure instinct would find #1 the most attractive, but a highly selective male in 2025 would see that this person is going to balloon to 250 after kids, be lazy, and cook a lot of meals with kraft cheese and heavy cream.
all that being said if you're not "attracted" to any of these women (except #2, which is pixar) you're a homosexual.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504316) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 5:56 PM Author: bronze business firm
theres no soybean oil(or even canola) in kraft singles. its not in their regular mac and cheese either.
maybe youre thinking about velveeta or some less common kraft product.
kraft singles are far from an ideal food and obviously processed as hell but very unfairly shit on by people who dont know what theyre talking about
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49505399)
|
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:51 AM Author: Poppy roast beef associate
no no no, see i know what you're trying to do here. this is what "men" who claim to "prefer" skinny "women" always try to do. they attempt to rationalize and abstract their preferences with ridiculous nonsense like "erm, but what i'm thinking is that a decade from now, this woman will be fatter or less attractive, therefore my brain is less/more attracted to her right now in this moment"
no. attraction is an animalistic, primal phenomenon. you either want to have sex with her, right now, or you don't. it's not an intellectual or abstract thing. we do not incorporate Reason into our sexual instincts
you can't fool me, buster
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504326) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:03 PM Author: impressive public bath
girl #1 is gonna smell like sweat and does not have the physical fitness to fuck good. girl #2 is going to be diligently manicured and have the energy and fitness of a cokehead because she is.
there's a certainly a primal, unthinking component to it as well. and most men with both options on the table are gonna choose #3. sorry buster.
i do agree #3 is too skinny and should eat a sandwich. but #1s thighs are touching all the way down to her knees.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504362) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:11 PM Author: Poppy roast beef associate
you're still coming up with these goofy abstract rationalizations that have nothing to do with your actual biological attraction/non-attraction to these women. you're totally full of shit!
it's fascinating to me that men so often try to pretend like they rationalize their sexual attraction. it's such a womanly thing. women do this way more, of course, and it's just as bogus when they do it, and we men all recognize that it's bogus when they do it. but then for some reason, a lot of men do it too. i think it's just over-socialization: they want their stated preferences to meet the social consensus
men's revealed preference is for generally thicker women. you don't ever see skinny porn stars. they always have implants or naturally big tits and curvaceous thighs and asses. nobody is jerking off to twiggy chicks. because men who claim they're attracted to skinny women are full of shit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504380) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:20 PM Author: impressive public bath
"there's a certainly a primal, unthinking component to it as well. and most men with both options on the table are gonna choose #3. sorry buster."
you conveniently skip over this part.
for as much as you lisp about my rationalizations i'm simply speculating on why most people would choose #3. but MOST PEOPLE WILL CHOOSE #3!
also, its a fucking preference, some will choose #1 of course. why can't you just accept that people have different primal preferences rather than insisting your POV is the correct one and everyone that says differently must be lying?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504404) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:30 PM Author: impressive public bath
i know i'm rolling with it.
i think you got it backwards, son. most people would fuck #3 and wife #1. #3 looks like a model whore, vapid, etc whereas #1 looks like she's already a mom.
this might have to do more with things outside their body type though. if #1 was gothed out and #3 was in a sundress maybe this would be reversed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504460) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:53 AM Author: razzle house-broken hissy fit
cr. OP is trying to mask his homosexuality with aggression and ideology.
just come out GaySuperstar
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504330)
|
Date: December 12th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: vibrant aqua cumskin
Brother... don't get me wrong, if 1 and 2 were both laying in my bed nude with their legs behind their heads i would plow away and cum inside with reckless abandon. But LJL at marrying or settling down with a landbeast like that. They look halfway decent because they're mid 20s.
If they were mid 30s or worse still, over 40, they would like absolutely horrific esp if they're eating and health (or lack thereof) habits continue. They are at their prime metabolisms and that shit certainly doesn't improve for women over time.
#3 I would settle down with all day and pop out 4 kids no problem.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504685) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 2:19 PM Author: impressive public bath
"you're not self aware!"
"physical attraction is primal, not about rationalizations!"
-- goysuperstar, apparently suffering no cognitive dissonance from these contradictory positions
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504792) |
|
|