RESOLVED: if you prefer skinny women to thicc women, your gay
| Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Apoplectic Light Abode | 12/12/25 | | crystalline rough-skinned national | 12/12/25 | | brilliant hospital | 12/12/25 | | lilac vigorous state | 12/12/25 | | Curious fishy stage | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | lascivious ruby rigor | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | lascivious ruby rigor | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Translucent french locus | 12/12/25 | | jet skinny woman trust fund | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | lascivious ruby rigor | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Curious fishy stage | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Curious fishy stage | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Walnut sexy friendly grandma | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Walnut sexy friendly grandma | 12/12/25 | | lascivious ruby rigor | 12/12/25 | | wine pea-brained electric furnace menage | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Curious fishy stage | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | brilliant hospital | 12/12/25 | | Coral Heady Kitty Cat | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | primrose beady-eyed pervert shrine | 12/12/25 | | exhilarant whorehouse keepsake machete | 12/12/25 | | razzle-dazzle mahogany brunch | 12/12/25 | | Wonderful Windowlicker Station | 12/12/25 | | Apoplectic Light Abode | 12/12/25 | | Slap-happy maroon hunting ground | 12/12/25 | | green odious library circlehead | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Translucent french locus | 12/12/25 | | flesh death wish pit | 12/12/25 | | aquamarine institution pozpig | 12/12/25 | | Free-loading frozen factory reset button box office | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Translucent french locus | 12/12/25 | | Curious fishy stage | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | flesh death wish pit | 12/12/25 | | Arousing Mint Principal's Office Liquid Oxygen | 12/12/25 | | Swashbuckling garrison | 12/12/25 | | Canary angry hell | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Vivacious Slate Background Story | 12/12/25 | | Canary angry hell | 12/12/25 | | primrose beady-eyed pervert shrine | 12/12/25 | | Outnumbered digit ratio gaping | 12/12/25 | | Swashbuckling garrison | 12/12/25 | | Arousing Mint Principal's Office Liquid Oxygen | 12/12/25 | | Arousing Mint Principal's Office Liquid Oxygen | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 | | Arousing Mint Principal's Office Liquid Oxygen | 12/12/25 | | Swashbuckling garrison | 12/12/25 | | Boyish dark faggotry | 12/12/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:48 AM Author: Vivacious Slate Background Story
in 2025 BMI is more a metric for how responsible and diligent a woman is. white people mitigate their primal instincts with rationality. a dindu going off pure instinct would find #1 the most attractive, but a highly selective male in 2025 would see that this person is going to balloon to 250 after kids, be lazy, and cook a lot of meals with kraft cheese and heavy cream.
all that being said if you're not "attracted" to any of these women (except #2, which is pixar) you're a homosexual.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504316) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 5:56 PM Author: Coral Heady Kitty Cat
theres no soybean oil(or even canola) in kraft singles. its not in their regular mac and cheese either.
maybe youre thinking about velveeta or some less common kraft product.
kraft singles are far from an ideal food and obviously processed as hell but very unfairly shit on by people who dont know what theyre talking about
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49505399)
|
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:51 AM Author: Boyish dark faggotry
no no no, see i know what you're trying to do here. this is what "men" who claim to "prefer" skinny "women" always try to do. they attempt to rationalize and abstract their preferences with ridiculous nonsense like "erm, but what i'm thinking is that a decade from now, this woman will be fatter or less attractive, therefore my brain is less/more attracted to her right now in this moment"
no. attraction is an animalistic, primal phenomenon. you either want to have sex with her, right now, or you don't. it's not an intellectual or abstract thing. we do not incorporate Reason into our sexual instincts
you can't fool me, buster
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504326) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:03 PM Author: Vivacious Slate Background Story
girl #1 is gonna smell like sweat and does not have the physical fitness to fuck good. girl #2 is going to be diligently manicured and have the energy and fitness of a cokehead because she is.
there's a certainly a primal, unthinking component to it as well. and most men with both options on the table are gonna choose #3. sorry buster.
i do agree #3 is too skinny and should eat a sandwich. but #1s thighs are touching all the way down to her knees.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504362) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:11 PM Author: Boyish dark faggotry
you're still coming up with these goofy abstract rationalizations that have nothing to do with your actual biological attraction/non-attraction to these women. you're totally full of shit!
it's fascinating to me that men so often try to pretend like they rationalize their sexual attraction. it's such a womanly thing. women do this way more, of course, and it's just as bogus when they do it, and we men all recognize that it's bogus when they do it. but then for some reason, a lot of men do it too. i think it's just over-socialization: they want their stated preferences to meet the social consensus
men's revealed preference is for generally thicker women. you don't ever see skinny porn stars. they always have implants or naturally big tits and curvaceous thighs and asses. nobody is jerking off to twiggy chicks. because men who claim they're attracted to skinny women are full of shit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504380) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:20 PM Author: Vivacious Slate Background Story
"there's a certainly a primal, unthinking component to it as well. and most men with both options on the table are gonna choose #3. sorry buster."
you conveniently skip over this part.
for as much as you lisp about my rationalizations i'm simply speculating on why most people would choose #3. but MOST PEOPLE WILL CHOOSE #3!
also, its a fucking preference, some will choose #1 of course. why can't you just accept that people have different primal preferences rather than insisting your POV is the correct one and everyone that says differently must be lying?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504404) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:30 PM Author: Vivacious Slate Background Story
i know i'm rolling with it.
i think you got it backwards, son. most people would fuck #3 and wife #1. #3 looks like a model whore, vapid, etc whereas #1 looks like she's already a mom.
this might have to do more with things outside their body type though. if #1 was gothed out and #3 was in a sundress maybe this would be reversed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504460) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:53 AM Author: primrose beady-eyed pervert shrine
cr. OP is trying to mask his homosexuality with aggression and ideology.
just come out GaySuperstar
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504330)
|
Date: December 12th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: Canary angry hell
Brother... don't get me wrong, if 1 and 2 were both laying in my bed nude with their legs behind their heads i would plow away and cum inside with reckless abandon. But LJL at marrying or settling down with a landbeast like that. They look halfway decent because they're mid 20s.
If they were mid 30s or worse still, over 40, they would like absolutely horrific esp if they're eating and health (or lack thereof) habits continue. They are at their prime metabolisms and that shit certainly doesn't improve for women over time.
#3 I would settle down with all day and pop out 4 kids no problem.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504685) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 2:19 PM Author: Vivacious Slate Background Story
"you're not self aware!"
"physical attraction is primal, not about rationalizations!"
-- goysuperstar, apparently suffering no cognitive dissonance from these contradictory positions
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310861#49504792) |
|
|