The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Humphrey’s Executor joining Barbaro and Roe v. Wade in hell
| Violet dysfunction stag film | 05/22/25 |
| Violet dysfunction stag film | 05/22/25 |
| Violet dysfunction stag film | 12/08/25 |
| insecure mind-boggling friendly grandma goyim | 12/09/25 |
| electric brethren | 12/09/25 |
| Violet dysfunction stag film | 12/09/25 |
| green regret dilemma | 12/09/25 |
| green regret dilemma | 12/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:08 PM Author: Violet dysfunction stag film big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule HE without mentioning it and just pull the plug?"
https://x.com/WilliamBaude/status/1925671526390444089 |
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:42 PM Author: Violet dysfunction stag film [taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.]
is this still a law bort? c'mon, man, Humphrey's Executor just bit the dust. |
|
Date: December 8th, 2025 11:04 PM Author: Violet dysfunction stag film (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495612) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 5:58 AM Author: insecure mind-boggling friendly grandma goyim Next up, 13th Amendment! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495893) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 8:41 AM Author: electric brethren (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49496020) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:17 AM Author: Violet dysfunction stag film Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are told.
https://x.com/amuse/status/1998123030917341316 |
 |
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:52 AM Author: green regret dilemma the cons have the right position on this, but i think this is going to wind up being a chaotic disaster. practically speaking, these phd dorks are the experts to whom (in many cases) we should probably defer, although i think the solution for that is going to be to gut federal agencies and minimize the power they have. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49496287) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:55 AM Author: green regret dilemma also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think jackson was saying the president should have NO power to fire agency heads, just that the "for cause" removal protections should be upheld.
the answer to the question she poses, though, is obviously that if the president is putting people in positions who know nothing, that's the senate's job to prevent that (which they clearly haven't done if you look at trump's nominees but that's a different issue altogether). |