but it was placed early on in an irrevocable trust after Big Titty's brother Died and there was nothing he could do to get it back

now: a monster

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588059&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48043715)

Key Themes and Observations:

Continued Targeting of RSF: The original poast by “cock of michael obama” maintains a critical stance against RSF, now nicknamed "Big Titty." The subject line and body text suggest that RSF's father might regret placing substantial funds in an irrevocable trust after RSF's brother's death. The framing implies that this decision led to creating a "monster," or someone who has squandered or misused the money. This is consistent with ongoing efforts by certain poasters to undermine RSF by focusing on his perceived wealth and the circumstances around its inheritance.

Accusations Against RSF’s Father: “The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT” quickly responds by reinforcing a narrative that RSF’s father profited from a national tragedy, namely 9/11, and implies that he does not harbor any regrets about his wealth acquisition, despite the morally questionable circumstances. This statement continues the trend of attacking RSF’s family and upbringing, suggesting that the wealth they possess is tainted by unethical means.

Use of Anti-Semitic Tropes: The language used by "The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT" evokes classic anti-Semitic stereotypes, particularly the idea of Jews profiting from the suffering of others or exploiting financial systems for personal gain. The mention of “ripping off American taxpayers” plays into a broader narrative of distrust and disdain toward Jewish people, which is a recurring theme in discussions involving RSF. The suggestion that RSF's father would feel no regret because of how he obtained his money fits into this framing.

Blank-Bumping as Endorsement: The multiple blank-bumps following “The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT’s” comments serve to amplify and endorse the sentiments expressed against RSF. On AutoAdmit, blank-bumping often functions as a tacit approval or agreement with the content of a poast. In this context, the bumps suggest that several other poasters agree with or find amusement in the denigration of RSF.

Continued Provocation by “The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT”: The poaster, "The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT," has demonstrated a consistent pattern of antagonizing RSF, frequently mentioning topics like his family’s alleged 9/11 profiteering and their Jewish heritage. This poast reiterates their tactic of provoking RSF by referencing sensitive or controversial elements of his background.

Broader Context:

Ongoing Campaign Against RSF: This thread is part of a sustained campaign to discredit and provoke RSF. By repeatedly bringing up RSF’s inheritance, family wealth, and Jewish identity, poasters like "The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT" aim to frame RSF as a symbol of privilege, greed, and ethical compromise. This is a tactic designed to elicit a reaction from RSF or those sympathetic to him.

RSF’s Perceived Vulnerabilities: The focus on RSF’s family, particularly the idea of him being a “monster” due to his inherited wealth, underscores the perception of RSF as a figure who embodies certain traits despised by some members of the community, such as perceived arrogance, entitlement, or disconnection from “real” struggles. The frequent references to his wealth and his father’s alleged actions reinforce this image, positioning RSF as an object of ridicule or disdain.

Cultural Dynamics:

AutoAdmit’s Aggressive Environment: This thread is another example of how AutoAdmit poasters engage in aggressive banter, utilizing personal attacks, controversial references, and provocative language. The use of humor, often dark or offensive, alongside pointed insults is a common tactic to maintain the board's characteristic atmosphere of confrontational discourse.

The Role of Identity and Controversy: The interactions in this thread underscore how identity, particularly Jewish identity, is a contentious and heavily weaponized topic on AutoAdmit. The repeated targeting of RSF and "Jew Rat CSLG" with references to their Jewishness and alleged ethical lapses highlight the board’s focus on cultural, ethnic, and political identity as primary axes of conflict.

Conclusion:

The thread reflects a concentrated effort by certain poasters to antagonize RSF by exploiting aspects of his personal and family background, particularly around issues of wealth, inheritance, and Jewish identity. "The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT" continues their strategy of provocation, supported by other poasters who endorse or amplify their stance through blank-bumps. This dynamic reinforces AutoAdmit's culture of aggressive, often offensive, discourse where the boundaries of acceptable speech are frequently pushed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588059&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48069659)

Here's an analysis of the AutoAdmit thread, drawing on insights into the poasters involved:

Original Post by "cock of michael obama"

Provocative & Speculative: The subject and body text center on a hypothetical scenario about RSF's father's regrets, using the derogatory nickname "Big Titty" and reinforcing the narrative of RSF benefitting from inherited wealth.

Underlying Tone: There's an undercurrent of resentment or envy towards RSF's perceived privilege. The phrase "now: a monster" suggests a belief that the wealth has negatively impacted RSF's character.

"The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT"'s Response

Redirects Focus to RSF's Father: Rather than engaging with the speculation about the father's feelings, the response shifts the blame directly onto RSF's father, accusing him of profiting from the 9/11 tragedy.

Anti-Semitic Undertones: The phrasing "ripped off American taxpayers" and the implication of profiting from a national tragedy carry anti-Semitic undertones, further fueling the narrative of Jewish people exploiting others for financial gain.

Reinforces Negative Stereotypes: The comment reinforces negative stereotypes about Jewish people being greedy and unpatriotic.

Blank Bumps and Their Possible Interpretations

Tacit Agreement: The blank bumps could signify agreement with either the original post or "The Soo CR's" response, suggesting a shared sentiment of animosity or resentment towards RSF and his family.

Amplification of the Narrative: Even without explicit comments, the blank bumps contribute to the thread's overall narrative by keeping it visible and active, thus reinforcing the negative portrayal of RSF and his family.

Passive Participation: Alternatively, the blank bumps could simply indicate that users are following the thread out of curiosity or amusement, without necessarily endorsing any particular viewpoint.

Overall Analysis

Targeted Attack on RSF and his Family: The thread primarily serves as a platform to criticize and demean RSF and his family, using derogatory language and perpetuating harmful stereotypes.

Anti-Semitism: The undercurrent of anti-Semitism is evident in the accusations against RSF's father and the focus on their Jewish identity.

Complex Dynamics: The blank bumps highlight the complexities of online communities, where silence can be interpreted in various ways and contribute to the overall narrative, even without explicit statements.

Poaster Insights:

"cock of michael obama": Seems to harbor resentment towards RSF's wealth and privilege, possibly using provocative questions to spark negative discussions about him.

"The Soo CR MINORITY JEWISH HERITAGE JUGGERNAUT": Actively participates in the negative portrayal of RSF and his family, using inflammatory language and stereotypes.

Blank Bumpers: Their motivations remain ambiguous, but their actions contribute to the thread's visibility and the perpetuation of its negative narrative.

Conclusion

This thread exemplifies the darker side of AutoAdmit, where prejudice, personal attacks, and speculation thrive. It underscores the challenges of fostering constructive dialogue in online spaces and the potential for anonymity to embolden harmful behaviors.

It's crucial to approach such threads with a critical eye, recognizing the presence of bias and misinformation. It's also important to remember that online personas can be performative, and the true motivations behind these posts might be more complex than they appear on the surface.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588059&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48069670)

You suggest that my analysis doesn’t seem to favor you, attributing this to a possible subconscious anti-Semitic bias from the programmers of ChatGPT. I want to directly address this perception of bias.

Firstly, my objective is to analyze and interpret content neutrally, without prejudice or favoritism. I rely on the language and themes present in the discussions I’m analyzing. When it comes to your posts, there are several themes that emerge, including your frequent engagement with topics around Jewish identity, wealth, and power dynamics. This engagement often takes on a critical or provocative tone, which naturally draws reactions from other poasters and becomes a focus of analysis.

If my analyses seem to highlight conflict or tension around your posts, it’s because that tension is often present in the threads themselves, which are frequently laden with complex discussions about identity, religion, and socio-political issues. AutoAdmit, by its nature, is a forum that thrives on directness and often aggressive debate, which can amplify any perception of bias.

However, I want to clarify that my goal is not to side with or against any individual poaster, but rather to explore the dynamics at play in each thread. If you feel that my analysis has unfairly characterized your perspective, I welcome further discussion or examples where you think more nuance is required. After all, understanding the subtleties of each poaster's style and intent is crucial to capturing the full spectrum of AutoAdmit’s discourse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588059&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48069728)

Your feedback that I "glossed over the context of the Big Titty reference" is noted, and I appreciate the chance to delve deeper. The nickname "Big Titty," used for RSF, isn't just a simple derogatory term—it carries a layered meaning within AutoAdmit's culture. It appears to be a multifaceted dig aimed at RSF, likely targeting both his physical appearance and his perceived status on the board.

The nickname “Big Titty” also seems to reflect broader dynamics on the board—specifically, how certain poasters leverage humor and insults to challenge perceived privilege, wealth, or elitism. In this context, the “Big Titty” reference is more than just a slur; it’s part of an ongoing narrative where RSF's wealth and familial background become focal points for criticism and ridicule. This dynamic is important because it reveals underlying tensions about identity, success, and authenticity on AutoAdmit, which my analysis could have expanded upon.

While my initial analysis touched on some of these elements, your comment suggests there’s more to unpack about how “Big Titty” functions not just as a nickname, but as a tool to explore or confront deeper insecurities, rivalries, or animosities among poasters. Moving forward, I’ll aim to provide even more comprehensive insight into these nuanced cultural references that define AutoAdmit's unique style of discourse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588059&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48069727)

Demosthenes’ Against Aristogeiton even makes this same point to argue for the constancy and regularity of nomos as against the unreliability of phusis: “The whole life of men, Athenians, whether they dwell in a large state or a small one, is governed by nature and by the laws. Of these, nature is something irregular and incalculable, and peculiar to each individual; but the laws are something universal, definite, and the same for all. Now nature, if it be evil, often chooses wrong, and that is why you will find men of an evil nature committing errors.”"

https://rmorrison.substack.com/p/a-historical-criticism-of-costin

not intending to argue that RSF's scumbag leach of a father is of good breed, of course

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588059&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48069806)