him sperging out about this shit proof of what a farce "political science" is. 99.9% of political science professors believe kamala was a great candidate and deserved to win. this is like being an engineering professor and every bridge you've designed collapsed immediately.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348365)

What does that tell you about 'political scientists'

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348371)

according to economists the biden economy was the best in history

according to political scientists both clinton and kamala were shoe ins to win their elections

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348386)

wait two weeks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348781)

I think you may be forgetting that he is a scientist.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348319)

Academia and government get a lot of crap in general relative to private businesses, among them NEWS OUTLETS, but also everything that happens at any corporation that isn’t 100% strictly Engineering is bullshit and fake and basically a plot to fuck over customers and white male Loser employees imo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348354)

anyway, i took modern drama and the prof was a MASSIVE shitlib, like super marxist wackadoo nonsense and he'd preach it to us.

he was telling us one day that the patriarchy extends everywhere you see man, they even used to think that male frogs chose their mates and the SCIENCE later proved that it's the females.

this chick drama student raised her hand and said "okay, so what are you telling us here? there's a frog conspiracy?"

the class erupted in laughter and the prof said "NO. i am TRYING to TEACH YOU PEOPLE that the patriarchy controls everything" and he went off on her for a couple more minutes, but he ended with "the patriarchy controls everything" and the chick said "i see that, for example in this fucking class" and she got up and left. it was 180.

the professor was clearly a pseduointellectual shitlib faggot who was not comfortable with anyone questioning his retarded ass talking points. kinda like lichtman! oh and the guy made $45k in 1999.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348370)

Dude not flame a chick I grew up with I think studied lit at Maryland. I wonder if it was her. She was so insanely pretty. A tall brunette kind of looked like Avril Lavigne. Really tall and lanky, pretty face, perky tits.

We had a thing briefly in the 10th grade. I was really smitten. She was absolutely stunning. But she was really fucking weird. Strange af personality. I think the whole reason she went to Maryland was to link up with some guy she was obsessed with. He was some shortmo Neo Nazi. They were really in a folie à deux. Both total nutjobs. She had a Facebook back when it was The Facebook. One that got away. If she hadn't been so attractive she wouldn't be memorable but she was a legit smokeshow. I think she thought she was going to be a famous writer some day. Her and her short king. I wonder if this was the same chick from your story lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348401)

UMD was pretty chill man. fucking HUGE. they had a spring concert every year (they still might) and in 1998 i went to it and saw RUN DMC, the roots and the junkyard gang or whatever (remember that we aint nothin but mammals song?)

i later represented UMD in labor matters. i had a great track record. I tried two cases before the state higher ed labor relations board and kicked the shit out of the union both times. they couldn't come with me when i left biglaw, bc they had a "contract" with my firm and couldn't move their work. huge bummer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348412)

MD is a beautiful state. Spent a lot of time there (unrelated). It's too bad it's so left wing. I have always had a strong connection to its people. Baltimore mogs DC imo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48348447)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48349269)

and then being like "The 49ers will certainly beat the Chiefs because they have an edge in my opinion in 4 of the 7 categories"

and then the game goes to overtime and Mahomes throws a 97 yard TD, and then the analyst acting butt hurt like "the keys to the game did not fail me Patrick Mahomes failed me!"

it's clown show level stupid

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48349103)

It's more like he did a historical analysis that said that the candidate and party in the best position to win always won. They won when they were better than the other guy, when the opponent had weaknesses and problems.

Then he spent decades with severe TDS living in a liberal bubble only talking to people who agreed with his worldview 100% and concluded that his side is always right and the other side is wrong. His method for picking the Super Bowl was I'm an unbelievable 9ers fan.

Nothing he says has any predictive nor historical value. It's just emotion and he retrofit it to pseudoscience. Of course the better candidate won every election. But there are no keys and never were. To correctly apply his keys you'd have to pick Dewey over Truman. He did pick Gore over Bush. He's just a retard. He's a ratfuck spinning.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48349222)

so, you see, he's only wrong if there is fraud or "disinformation" has caused the stupid masses to vote wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48349227)