TRUMP to sign executive order to remove birthright citizenship for illegals
| Donald MASE Trump | 11/07/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 11/07/24 | | Live Free or Die. | 11/07/24 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 11/07/24 | | ....,,....,,... | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | Donald MASE Trump | 11/07/24 | | cannon | 11/07/24 | | Donald MASE Trump | 11/07/24 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 11/07/24 | | Donald MASE Trump | 11/07/24 | | lsd | 11/07/24 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 11/07/24 | | gibberish (?) | 11/07/24 | | .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,.,.,:::,...,:,...:..:.,:.::,. | 11/07/24 | | UhOh | 11/07/24 | | Donald MASE Trump | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 11/07/24 | | UhOh | 11/07/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | UhOh | 11/07/24 | | Judas Jones | 11/07/24 | | Nippon Professional Baseball | 11/07/24 | | My xo friends have enriched me tremendously. | 11/07/24 | | Coach McGirk | 11/07/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 11/07/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 11/07/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 11/07/24 | | cannon | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | cannon | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 11/07/24 | | Monday Preceding Apocalypse | 11/07/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 11/07/24 | | malcolm x | 11/07/24 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | LathamTouchedMe | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | LathamTouchedMe | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | LathamTouchedMe | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | LathamTouchedMe | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | Refunkulus | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | lsd | 11/07/24 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 11/07/24 | | Trump is the Lib Killer | 11/07/24 | | Kenneth Play | 11/07/24 | | Donald MASE Trump | 11/07/24 | | .....,,,,,...,,,,,..,.,,,,,.,,. | 11/07/24 | | law discussion | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | Nippon Professional Baseball | 11/07/24 | | TRUMP cheeks | 11/07/24 | | watery cum | 11/07/24 | | Nippon Professional Baseball | 11/07/24 | | watery cum | 11/07/24 | | Nippon Professional Baseball | 11/07/24 | | watery cum | 11/07/24 | | chud | 11/07/24 | | mexican pizza | 11/07/24 | | UN peacekeeper | 11/07/24 | | Trump is the Lib Killer | 11/07/24 | | Nippon Professional Baseball | 11/07/24 | | Trump is the Lib Killer | 11/07/24 | | AZNgirl aborting AZNbaby to celebrate Trump Win | 11/07/24 | | Ass Sunstein | 11/07/24 | | AZNgirl aborting AZNbaby to celebrate Trump Win | 11/07/24 | | sph | 11/07/24 | | UhOh | 11/07/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 11/07/24 | | sph | 11/07/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | Ass Sunstein | 11/07/24 | | AZNgirl aborting AZNbaby to celebrate Trump Win | 11/07/24 | | chud | 11/07/24 | | .;:..;:;.:.;.,,,.,.:,.;;,;;;..;, | 11/07/24 | | Ass Sunstein | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | Darnell | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 11/07/24 | | chud | 11/07/24 | | cowstack | 11/07/24 | | Candy Ride | 11/07/24 | | Pumo Trump ...,.,.,.,.,.,.,,,,.... | 11/07/24 | | "'"'"'"''' | 11/07/24 | | Jed Dews | 11/07/24 | | Trump is the Lib Killer | 11/07/24 | | but at what cost | 11/07/24 | | .,.,....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,...,:,..;,.., | 11/07/24 | | Candy Ride | 11/07/24 | | Donald MASE Trump | 11/07/24 | | Metal Up Your Ass | 11/07/24 | | Trump Wins | 11/07/24 | | .,.,.,,.,,..,,,.,.,...,.,,.,. | 11/07/24 | | Trump is the Lib Killer | 11/07/24 | | Donald MASE Trump | 11/07/24 | | but at what cost | 11/07/24 | | .........\'.........\'\'.......\'\'\' | 11/07/24 | | Paddy O'Wagon | 11/07/24 | | Kenneth Play | 11/07/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 7th, 2024 9:50 AM Author: ceci n'est pas un avocat
Can't wait for xo Clarence to author an opinion limiting citizenship to individuals born within the 13 colonies
the rest of you Johnny come latelies can get wrecked
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48304962) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:04 AM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
You mean during the 24 hours before it is struck down by the courts?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305026) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:15 AM
Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,.,.,:::,...,:,...:..:.,:.::,.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305090) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:03 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305021) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:06 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
the basic argument
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-toUNR9Vo6w
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305041) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 1:19 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
and American Indians.
the notion was that if you have divided loyalty you do not get BRC.
so the child of two Mexican citizens has divided loyalty and therefore Congress is free to regulate that child's citizenship or lack of citizenship.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305971) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 1:19 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
see the article i c/p below.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305972) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 1:18 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
No, the notion was reciprocity of undivided loyalty. A non-citizen cannot be tried for treason. That was actually discussed at the time.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305967) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:10 AM Author: cannon
They just need to make that clear instead of leaving it up for a different interpretation:
Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 211 n.10 (1982). "Justice Gray, writing for the Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark ... detailed at some length the history of the Citizenship Clause, and the predominantly geographic sense in which the term 'jurisdiction' was used. He further noted that it was 'impossible to construe the words "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" ... as less comprehensive than the words "within its jurisdiction" ... or to hold that persons "within the jurisdiction" of one of the States of the Union are not "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States."' ... As one early commentator noted, given the historical emphasis on geographic territoriality, bounded only, if at all, by principles of sovereignty and allegiance, no plausible distinction with respect to Fourteenth Amendment 'jurisdiction' can be drawn between resident aliens whose entry into the United States was lawful, and resident aliens whose entry was unlawful."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305059) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:21 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
and one lefty law prof has made the case for Congress being able to declare BRC not applying to the children of non-citizens.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305120) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 1:08 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Opinion
Op-Ed Contributor
Birthright of a Nation
By Peter H. Schuck
Aug. 13, 2010
Share full article
DESPITE persistent calls for comprehensive immigration reform, the hot debate today is about an old issue: birthright citizenship.
The citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868, provides that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States...” This language has traditionally been interpreted to give automatic citizenship to anyone born on American soil, even to the children of illegal immigrants.
Congress plans to hold hearings this fall on a constitutional amendment to change that language, something even moderate Republican senators like South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham support. With a new study showing that undocumented mothers account for a disproportionate number of births, even some Democrats might find it hard to stand opposed to altering the citizenship clause.
Fortunately, the history of the clause suggests an effective, pragmatic solution that should appeal to both parties.
The clause’s purpose was to guarantee citizenship for former slaves Β a right Congress had enacted in 1866 Β and to overrule the infamous Dred Scott decision, which had denied blacks citizenship and helped precipitate the Civil War.
But the clause also excluded from birthright citizenship people who were not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” This exclusion was primarily aimed at the American-born children of American Indians and foreign diplomats and soldiers, categories governed by other sovereign entities.
The citizenship clause reflected a new American approach to political membership. Under common law dating back to the early 17th century, national allegiance had been perpetual, not consensual. Our country contested this assumption during the War of 1812 after the British impressed Americans into the Royal Navy, insisting that they remained the king’s subjects.
By 1868, Congress had come to view citizenship as a mutual relationship to which both the nation and the individual must consent. This explains why it passed Β one day before the citizenship clause was ratified Β the Expatriation Act, allowing Americans to shed their American or foreign citizenship.
Particularly relevant to today’s controversy was the floor debate on the citizenship clause. It suggested that the American-born children of resident aliens would indeed be citizens, a suggestion confirmed in an 1898 Supreme Court decision involving the son of a resident Chinese couple.
Congress did not, however, discuss the status of children of illegal immigrants Β at the time, federal law didn’t limit immigration, so no parents were here illegally.
Nevertheless, it is hard to believe that Congress would have surrendered the power to regulate citizenship for such a group, much less grant it automatically to people whom it might someday bar from the country. The Supreme Court has never squarely held otherwise, although it did assume, without explanation, in a brief 1982 footnote that the American-born children of illegal immigrants were constitutional citizens. This history suggests that Congress can act on birthright citizenship without a constitutional amendment.
Fast-forward to today to an America with 11 million illegal immigrants. If the Constitution permits Congress to regulate their children’s citizenship by statute, what should that statute provide?
This question is much harder than the zealots on both sides suggest. The argument against any birthright citizenship is that these children are here as a result of an illegal act and thus have no claim to membership in a country built on the ideal of mutual consent.
In the extreme case of “anchor babies” Β children born after a mother briefly crosses the border to give birth Β the notion of automatic citizenship for the child strikes most people as not only anomalous but also offensive. No other developed country except Canada, which has relatively few illegal immigrants, has rules that would allow it.
At the same time, we rightly resist punishing children for their parents’ crimes. Without birthright citizenship, they could be legally stranded, perhaps even stateless, in a country where they were born and may spend their lives. And because more than a third of undocumented parents have a least one American child, ending birthright citizenship would greatly increase the number of undocumented people in the country.
Fortunately, these strongly competing values, combined with the notion of mutual-consent citizenship, suggest a solution: condition the citizenship of such children on having what international law terms a “genuine connection” to American society.
This is already a practice in some European countries, where laws requiring blood ties to existing citizens have been relaxed to give birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants who have lived in the country for some time Β Britain, for example, requires 10 years and no long absences from the country.
Congress should do likewise, perhaps conditioning birthright citizenship on a certain number of years of education in American schools; such children could apply for citizenship at, say, age 10. The children would become citizens retroactively, regardless of their parents’ status.
Other aspects of the larger immigration debate would continue, of course. But such a principled yet pragmatic solution to the birthright citizenship question could point the way toward common ground on immigration reform.
Peter H. Schuck, a professor of law at Yale, is a co-editor of “Understanding America: The Anatomy of an Exceptional Nation.”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305941) |
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:01 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
i think Congress can act on that, but i don't think a mere EO will suffice.
Peter Schuck of YLS had the best analysis and he says Congress can restrict people who have foreign citizenship from having BR citizenship.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305014) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 11:11 AM Author: Trump Wins
Why would I "admit" that as if the filibuster is some secret procedure known only to astute liberal political scientists like yourself? If GOP has both chambers, which they will, then they can do it. Filibuster has been demolished already by dems and then by GOP. The precedent has already been sent.
Anyway he's doing it by exec order so none of this matters. Looking forward to your hyperventilating when your anchor babies get deported. Sorry you hate America so much you want to see invaders take it over.
Admit that all you're faggy analysis of the election was completely wrong.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305394) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 11:20 AM Author: Trump Wins
Lol at your "thoughtful moderate" shtick. There is not a single issue you agree with the GOP on. You want massive illegal immigration and massive amnesty for illegals.
Birthright citizenship is an abomination and has led to a massive underclass of welfare americans who do nothing but suck this country dry of its resources.
Nearly every other country on earth recognizes what a mistake birthright citizenship is.
It's going away by executive order or otherwise.
Conservative lawyers and law professors have already written tomes about the basis for getting rid of it. It's not nearly as 'legally contentious' as shitlibs think.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305456) |
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:05 AM
Author: .....,,,,,...,,,,,..,.,,,,,.,,.
180
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305036) |
Date: November 7th, 2024 10:28 AM Author: Trump is the Lib Killer (TDNW)
need to ban it for visitors and people on temporary visas too
so many gooks and russians get passports this way
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305162) |
Date: November 7th, 2024 11:43 AM Author: Pumo Trump ...,.,.,.,.,.,.,,,,.... (Trump Trump Trump)
Trump voter here. This is stupid and unconstitutiinal. Sry.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305574) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 12:15 PM
Author: .,.,....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,...,:,..;,..,
fuck off Mandy you retarded bitch
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305691) |
Date: November 7th, 2024 12:09 PM Author: Metal Up Your Ass
1800% on board with the thought.
Not sure about the method.
ALL incentives to come here illegally need to be removed.
They need to get that case requiring schooling of illegals' kids overturned.
Illegals shouldn't get access to any welfare type program.
DACA shit needs to be kilt.
No one who came here illegally, at any age, should ever be given citizenship.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305664) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2024 12:36 PM
Author: .,.,.,,.,,..,,,.,.,...,.,,.,.
This. You hit the nail on the head. It’s the incentives of coming here that need to be nixed. Wasn’t that what Harris was put in charge of as border czar? Lol
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5629408&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#48305786) |
|
|