\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
Exhilarant bespoke haunted graveyard therapy
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
Flatulent university
  12/08/25
You know how
Sepia Stirring Philosopher-king
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
Exhilarant bespoke haunted graveyard therapy
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
rose cracking queen of the night
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
Exhilarant bespoke haunted graveyard therapy
  12/08/25
...
rose cracking queen of the night
  12/08/25
180
vibrant brilliant sweet tailpipe heaven
  12/09/25
...
Swashbuckling wagecucks business firm
  12/09/25
correct
concupiscible jewess
  12/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: Exhilarant bespoke haunted graveyard therapy

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Flatulent university

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Sepia Stirring Philosopher-king

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: Exhilarant bespoke haunted graveyard therapy

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: rose cracking queen of the night

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: Exhilarant bespoke haunted graveyard therapy

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: rose cracking queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: vibrant brilliant sweet tailpipe heaven

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: Swashbuckling wagecucks business firm



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: concupiscible jewess

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864",#49495777)