\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
Learning Disabled Laughsome Menage
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
Passionate Coiffed Athletic Conference Hospital
  12/08/25
You know how
Vivacious national
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
Learning Disabled Laughsome Menage
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
Aromatic azure brethren
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
Learning Disabled Laughsome Menage
  12/08/25
...
Aromatic azure brethren
  12/08/25
180
avocado indecent church
  12/09/25
...
Aphrodisiac address
  12/09/25
correct
Cocky insane giraffe patrolman
  12/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: Learning Disabled Laughsome Menage

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Passionate Coiffed Athletic Conference Hospital

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Vivacious national

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: Learning Disabled Laughsome Menage

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: Aromatic azure brethren

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: Learning Disabled Laughsome Menage

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: Aromatic azure brethren



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: avocado indecent church

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: Aphrodisiac address



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: Cocky insane giraffe patrolman

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49495777)