\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

A lot of medieval scholasticism was just taking the LSAT in reverse

The LSAT does all the writing for you, you just pick the rig...
smoky shrine
  08/10/26
dont like this because extreme smarts like me take too big s...
Nofapping senate stock car
  08/10/26
That's fine, we'll just let you publish in the vernacular so...
smoky shrine
  08/10/26
can u explain descartes meaning here? and why did the rheto...
Nofapping senate stock car
  08/10/26
Butterfly effect of Constantine's conversion
smoky shrine
  08/10/26
180
Seedy floppy pervert goyim
  08/10/26
In the classroom and in writing, it often takes the form of ...
smoky shrine
  08/10/26
The last sentence there definitely follows from the rest!
know-it-all tantric genital piercing native
  08/10/26
Philosopher Johann Beukes has suggested that from 1349 to 14...
smoky shrine
  08/10/26
...
talented poppy gas station coffee pot
  08/10/26
Are you sure? have you read the wikipedia entry for Scholast...
mauve locus
  08/10/26
Mastery of syllogistic reasoning was your ticket into the cl...
smoky shrine
  08/10/26
what
mauve locus
  08/10/26
Descartes was saying syllogistic reasoning can't get you to ...
smoky shrine
  08/10/26
Oh ok cool
mauve locus
  08/10/26
cr! x, y, z, ... ... ... it was all the persians
talented poppy gas station coffee pot
  08/10/26
...
Seedy floppy pervert goyim
  08/10/26
I like how THE LOGIC led St. Augustin to conclude that the s...
laughsome chartreuse station
  08/10/26
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the...
smoky shrine
  08/10/26
...
demanding confused toaster prole
  08/11/26
https://i.imgur.com/7OT3nXm.png
smoky shrine
  08/11/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:18 PM
Author: smoky shrine

The LSAT does all the writing for you, you just pick the right answer. In medieval dissertations you had to do all the writing, and you had to use LSAT logic to make your points. Your logic had to be tight at each step. It didn't matter what you were writing about, you had to score a 180. There couldn't be any gaps in your reasoning. Even if you were just writing about a medicinal plant from the Dutch Indies, you had to go out of your way to prove your command of formal logic. They did this in the middle east for a long time too. Persians thought you had to show your command of LSAT logic before you could say anything else. Descartes didn't invent nuthin

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059531)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM
Author: Nofapping senate stock car

dont like this because extreme smarts like me take too big steps that normals cant rly follow so its unfair

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059539)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:33 PM
Author: smoky shrine

That's fine, we'll just let you publish in the vernacular so that you'll be the smartest author anyone can pick up and read

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059593)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:38 PM
Author: Nofapping senate stock car

can u explain descartes meaning here? and why did the rhetoric ppl all study religion if they are suppose to be logical

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059607)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:47 PM
Author: smoky shrine

Butterfly effect of Constantine's conversion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059623)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:19 PM
Author: Seedy floppy pervert goyim

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059535)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM
Author: smoky shrine

In the classroom and in writing, it often takes the form of explicit disputation: a topic drawn from the tradition is broached in the form of a proposition on a question to be debated, oppositional responses are given, a counterproposal is argued and oppositional arguments rebutted. Because of its emphasis on rigorous dialectical method, scholasticism was eventually applied to many other fields of study.[6][7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059540)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM
Author: know-it-all tantric genital piercing native

The last sentence there definitely follows from the rest!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059541)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:37 PM
Author: smoky shrine

Philosopher Johann Beukes has suggested that from 1349 to 1464, the era between the deaths of William of Ockham and Nicholas of Cusa, there was a distinct period characterized by "robust and independent philosophers" who departed from high scholasticism on issues such as institutional criticism and materialism but retained scholasticism's method. These philosophers include Marsilius of Padua, Thomas Bradwardine, John Wycliffe, Catherine of Sienna, Jean Gerson, Gabriel Biel and ended with Nicholas of Cusa.[30]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059602)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:08 PM
Author: talented poppy gas station coffee pot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059694)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:52 PM
Author: mauve locus

Are you sure? have you read the wikipedia entry for Scholasticism yet? It's all in there. QED.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059635)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:01 PM
Author: smoky shrine

Mastery of syllogistic reasoning was your ticket into the club. It was necessary, but no one said it was sufficient to do anything, just like no one thinks a perfect LSAT score qualifies you to practice law. Descartes whined that "but syllogistic reasoning isn't enough," but in order to make that argument Descartes also had to demonstrate his mastery of syllogistic reasoning. And here we are in the 21st century still taking the LSAT.

So what was Descartes really trying to say? What's he got to teach us right now?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059662)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:04 PM
Author: mauve locus

what

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059680)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:06 PM
Author: smoky shrine

Descartes was saying syllogistic reasoning can't get you to true knowledge. But anyone trying to figure out who John the Baptist was could have told you the same thing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059689)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:10 PM
Author: mauve locus

Oh ok cool

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059707)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:03 PM
Author: talented poppy gas station coffee pot

cr! x, y, z, ... ... ... it was all the persians

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059674)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:03 PM
Author: Seedy floppy pervert goyim



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059675)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 9:49 PM
Author: laughsome chartreuse station

I like how THE LOGIC led St. Augustin to conclude that the saints in heaven enjoy watching the torments of sinners in hell.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059631)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 11:38 PM
Author: smoky shrine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the_Mind

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50059959)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 11th, 2026 5:57 AM
Author: demanding confused toaster prole



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50060248)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 11th, 2026 7:25 PM
Author: smoky shrine

https://i.imgur.com/7OT3nXm.png

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50062017)