\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but th...
Navy Roommate Native
  12/06/25
I wouldn't.
impertinent foreskin
  12/06/25
great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really&quo...
Crystalline swollen chad chapel
  12/06/25
Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"
impertinent foreskin
  12/06/25
...
Talented Magical Hunting Ground
  12/06/25
pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and y...
indigo friendly grandma
  12/06/25
People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge to...
Navy Roommate Native
  12/06/25
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including ...
indigo friendly grandma
  12/06/25
...
laughsome pink mad cow disease
  12/06/25
...
laughsome pink mad cow disease
  12/06/25
use "unserious" instead
razzle fighting son of senegal point
  12/06/25
could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs
Crystalline swollen chad chapel
  12/06/25
Nonsensical
impertinent foreskin
  12/06/25
"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"
electric slippery mexican field
  12/06/25
"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g...
indigo friendly grandma
  12/06/25
"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh w...
electric slippery mexican field
  12/06/25
that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. b...
indigo friendly grandma
  12/07/25
Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no be...
electric slippery mexican field
  12/07/25
Seems cheap
racy doctorate parlor
  12/06/25
wacky
Dead Office Weed Whacker
  12/06/25
finna make shiz up
impertinent foreskin
  12/06/25
“trooned out”
Cerebral Death Wish
  12/06/25
frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specio...
Swashbuckling abode stock car
  12/06/25
the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr
indigo friendly grandma
  12/06/25
Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat ou...
Navy Roommate Native
  12/06/25
Drop a few "Not so."s.
pearly appetizing step-uncle's house coffee pot
  12/06/25
"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."
Rough-skinned House
  12/06/25
...
Navy Roommate Native
  12/06/25
"nigger"
mewling trailer park
  12/07/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:29 PM
Author: Navy Roommate Native

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but that seems clearly over the line.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488467)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:32 PM
Author: impertinent foreskin

I wouldn't.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488479)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:34 PM
Author: Crystalline swollen chad chapel

great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really" silly, or perhaps "super" silly so they dont get confused.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488493)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: impertinent foreskin

Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488503)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:46 PM
Author: Talented Magical Hunting Ground



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488525)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: indigo friendly grandma

pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and you look worse to the court.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488501)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:47 PM
Author: Navy Roommate Native

People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge too far.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488531)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM
Author: indigo friendly grandma

bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."

there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.

tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488562)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:20 PM
Author: laughsome pink mad cow disease



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488652)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: laughsome pink mad cow disease



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488646)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:48 PM
Author: razzle fighting son of senegal point

use "unserious" instead

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488536)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: Crystalline swollen chad chapel

could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488556)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:58 PM
Author: impertinent foreskin

Nonsensical

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488565)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:02 PM
Author: electric slippery mexican field

"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49489724)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: indigo friendly grandma

"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g. fundamental case that every idiot knows).

recently ACB cited marbury when addressing a KTJ dissent that was absolutely ruthless. that's far more effective and devasting than saying "KTJ's dissent is silly." don't say it's silly, show why it's silly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488570)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:03 PM
Author: electric slippery mexican field

"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh when people say that. it could mean a million things. u saying they got the law wrong? applied the facts to the law wrong? etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49489727)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: indigo friendly grandma

that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. but itt we don't know why candy ride thinks OCs argument is silly so a catch-all is appropriate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49491128)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:10 AM
Author: electric slippery mexican field

Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no better than silly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49491145)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:01 PM
Author: racy doctorate parlor

Seems cheap

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488572)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:17 PM
Author: Dead Office Weed Whacker

wacky

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488636)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:18 PM
Author: impertinent foreskin

finna make shiz up

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488642)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: Cerebral Death Wish

“trooned out”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488651)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: Swashbuckling abode stock car

frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specious, unsupported by precedent or statute, and should be afforded no weight by the court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488669)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: indigo friendly grandma

the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488673)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:23 PM
Author: Navy Roommate Native

Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat out wrong"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49489067)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:27 PM
Author: pearly appetizing step-uncle's house coffee pot

Drop a few "Not so."s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49489083)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:28 PM
Author: Rough-skinned House

"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49489090)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:33 PM
Author: Navy Roommate Native



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49489103)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:26 AM
Author: mewling trailer park

"nigger"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49491178)