Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?
| Navy Roommate Native | 12/06/25 | | impertinent foreskin | 12/06/25 | | Crystalline swollen chad chapel | 12/06/25 | | impertinent foreskin | 12/06/25 | | Talented Magical Hunting Ground | 12/06/25 | | indigo friendly grandma | 12/06/25 | | Navy Roommate Native | 12/06/25 | | indigo friendly grandma | 12/06/25 | | laughsome pink mad cow disease | 12/06/25 | | laughsome pink mad cow disease | 12/06/25 | | razzle fighting son of senegal point | 12/06/25 | | Crystalline swollen chad chapel | 12/06/25 | | impertinent foreskin | 12/06/25 | | electric slippery mexican field | 12/06/25 | | indigo friendly grandma | 12/06/25 | | electric slippery mexican field | 12/06/25 | | indigo friendly grandma | 12/07/25 | | electric slippery mexican field | 12/07/25 | | racy doctorate parlor | 12/06/25 | | Dead Office Weed Whacker | 12/06/25 | | impertinent foreskin | 12/06/25 | | Cerebral Death Wish | 12/06/25 | | Swashbuckling abode stock car | 12/06/25 | | indigo friendly grandma | 12/06/25 | | Navy Roommate Native | 12/06/25 | | pearly appetizing step-uncle's house coffee pot | 12/06/25 | | Rough-skinned House | 12/06/25 | | Navy Roommate Native | 12/06/25 | | mewling trailer park | 12/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM Author: indigo friendly grandma
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."
there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.
tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#49488562) |
|
|