The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is height an advantage or disadvantage in modern warfare?
| floppy silver property mad-dog skullcap | 08/16/26 |
| Odious Geriatric Foreskin Brethren | 08/19/26 |
| Odious Geriatric Foreskin Brethren | 08/19/26 |
| Laughsome Affirmative Action Mood | 08/19/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 16th, 2026 1:26 AM Author: floppy silver property mad-dog skullcap Seems like it would be very situational based on the cover available. A 6'4 chad can comfortably aim over a 5'6 brick wall that a manlet can only cower behind as cover.
But if ambused in a field or evading drones or something you are suddenly a lanky goofball about to star in a liveleak clip |
Date: August 19th, 2026 8:20 AM Author: Odious Geriatric Foreskin Brethren Operators are constantly doing shit that would cause someone to get injured. Incredibly Tall guys are more likely to fuck up their knees and shit imo.
Afaik modern war means shooting off into the horizon usually with artillery or just using drones. Also Night Vision.
If we ever did Single Combat vs Bin Laden (6’5 iirc) you’d want a guy with Reach. |
|
Date: August 19th, 2026 8:21 AM Author: Odious Geriatric Foreskin Brethren Btw liveleak shut down awhile ago (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893543&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50077623) |
|
Date: August 19th, 2026 8:34 AM Author: Laughsome Affirmative Action Mood It has been a disadvantage since long before the modern era, basically since widespread adoption of individual firearms rather than melee weapons (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893543&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310864#50077629) |