'meritocracy' arguments are not based, they're extremely asian
| Kenneth Peacock Tynan | 09/30/24 | | ai | 09/30/24 | | Kenneth Peacock Tynan | 09/30/24 | | ai | 09/30/24 | | racist internet poster | 09/30/24 | | ai | 09/30/24 | | jfr | 09/30/24 | | Kenneth Peacock Tynan | 09/30/24 | | Ass Sunstein | 09/30/24 | | jfr | 09/30/24 | | Pumonymous | 09/30/24 | | jfr | 09/30/24 | | Ass Sunstein | 09/30/24 | | bho | 09/30/24 | | ai | 09/30/24 | | zyn | 09/30/24 | | bho | 09/30/24 | | zyn | 09/30/24 | | jfr | 09/30/24 | | Self-serious Macbook Airplane Girl | 09/30/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 30th, 2024 5:50 PM Author: zyn
Meritocracy is obviously good
What you actually mean is that meritocracy based on goofy and useless criteria like drilling for standardized tests is not based (it's not)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5603954&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48147451) |
|
|