Dems picked a dumber HRC. How is this possible?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064081)

many latinos and asians are similar--they vote Dem simply because they don't like white people. totally brainless, tribal mentality. Dems could run some ruthless psychopath (like Kamala may turn out to be) and these people simply would not give a fuck. they are convinced Republicans are "rathith" or something. this is what Dems have going for them, along with the fact that they've imported 30% of Haiti, a bunch more africans, and other assorted muds and browns to fortify their stupid, racist base

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064175)

“They’ve imported 30% of Haiti”

Wow! How many of them can and will vote, btw?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064194)

Jew Online: "Trust me, I'm not saying this because I'm happy about it, but we all know that there were voting irregularities in 2020 so therefore millions of illegal Haitians will be voting in November in swing states, Donald Trump simply can't win it's all over. Honestly there's no point in even continuing to support him or bothering to vote, we should just give up now, Fellow White Men."

It's all so gay and tiresome -- why do midwit kikes insist on pulling this retarded 90 IQ nihilism bullshit?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064339)

GOP is pretty personality cultish, Dems are mostly right there. They do much better when Trump is on the ballot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064177)

Fading was inevitable, she didn't suddenly become not retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064148)

But yes, even the rubes realize the 25K down payment assistance just adds 25K to the price of the home.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064184)

when faced with a ruling elite that has a closed feedback loop of power (academia -> media -> politicians -> government -> academia), basically the only way to affect it from the outside is from attempts at de-legitimizing them in the eyes of the public (i.e. the canadian truckers protesting fraudvirus deathjabs)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064496)

Wait, I thought "accelerationism" was strictly for copium-huffing retards, and foolishly thinking that stuff like "The Trucker Protest" and "Kanye the Nazi" would have any impact on public sentiment was reserved for 90 IQ midwidiots who can't handle the REAL blackpilled truth that nothing ever changes and Jews will just endlessly rule over a black and brown planet forever?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064504)

I understand the accelerationist perspective though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064506)

If this sounds familiar, it’s because President Biden employed the same strategy. It didn’t work out so well for him – and it may not for Harris either.”

https://newrepublic.com/article/185705/kamala-harris-imitating-biden-bad-media-strategy?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SF_TNR&utm_source=Twitter

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064236)

====

Harris is more than capable of talking to the press and taking clear stances on issues (even if she’s developing a habit of changing her mind, even on issues that almost no one is talking about). She should talk to the press more. She should do it to show that she can run the country, which she can. She should do it to show that she understands policy, which she does. She should do it because it will generate media attention that will almost certainly benefit her campaign. But she should also do it to show that she isn’t just running the same campaign that was losing handily to Trump six weeks ago. Because right now, that’s exactly what she’s doing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064269)

It's gonna be 180 when Trump loses again and Trumpmos go insane. It's gonna be 2020 x 1000000

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064245)

Trump was looking at a possible 300 point EV, he was probably the favorite to win NEW JERSEY. Democrats would have probably lost the house and 5 seats in the senate.

She's predictibly fading, but her campaign still has her at like a +2.5 % lead nationally - despite her being a historically unpopular vice president, who garnered 1% of the vote in the last primary, and who is basically pushing the same policies that led us to an economy where in just 3 years Americans went from record savings to record debt, not to mention the 2 wars, 10 million illegals a year, etc.

Given the hand their dealt, it's rpetty impressive they have a puncher's chance at the white house - and more importantly, they've got a fair fight in all their congressional battles - whereas Biden was going to drag all their candidates by like 2-5%

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064266)

"You Trumpmos are retarded, last time I checked Kamala is still UP 2.5% nationally, retards!"

Oh wow, shit... btw, on September 8th 2020, Joe Biden was up ~7.5% nationally over Trump, and yet he still ultimately only "beat" Trump by <50,000 votes in the handful of swing states that actually matter. As yet another point of comparison, Clinton was up ~4% over Trump at this point in 2016... can you remind me how that one turned out, again?

It's almost like national polling only carries significance to the extent that it serves as a rough barometer for which way the wind is generally blowing within the swing states, and not in any absolute sense... and as a result, it's almost like a mere +2.5% national margin for a Dem POTUS candidate is actually very bad news for shitlibs when you frame it in the proper context and consider it from an informed historical angle.

Kamala's polling is actually very bad and quickly moving in the wrong direction, and unless something BIG happens at the debate, it seems likely to continue to trend in that direction because she is a deeply unlikeable empty suit midwit candidate who is still pushing unpopular economic policies even AFTER he shameless attempt to "pivot" to the middle and the media can only cover for her and try to obfuscate that successfully for so long. BUT LJL @ retards like you who run around saying shit like "B-B-BUT SHE'S STILL UP NATIONALLY AND BIDEN GOT 7,000,000 MORE VOTES in 2020!!!!" while thinking you sound thoooo thmart and well informed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064352)

Shut the fuck up, Jew.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064409)

What exactly do you think Trump is potentially going to do in the next 60 days that will shock or piss off anyone enough to suddenly make them change their vote? Please be specific.

"OMG DID YOU HEAR, DONALD TRUMP SAID SOMETHING EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE AND THEN ENDORSED A WILD CONSPIRACY THEORY ON THE INTERNET! THE MEDIA IS IN AN UPROAR ABOUT IT, THIS IS A HUGE STORY!"

"HOLY SHIT, REALLY? THAT'S INSANE... THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING FOR ME!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590949&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#48064440)