The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| vivacious federal quadroon shrine | 01/06/26 | | Twisted chest-beating hell national security agency | 01/06/26 | | Impressive kitchen | 01/06/26 | | Twisted chest-beating hell national security agency | 01/06/26 | | Impressive kitchen | 01/06/26 | | Twisted chest-beating hell national security agency | 01/06/26 | | vivacious federal quadroon shrine | 01/06/26 | | Twisted chest-beating hell national security agency | 01/06/26 | | vivacious federal quadroon shrine | 01/06/26 | | aphrodisiac buff windowlicker nursing home | 01/07/26 | | beta area knife | 01/06/26 | | onyx nighttime mediation therapy | 01/06/26 | | Impressive kitchen | 01/06/26 | | Glittery embarrassed to the bone prole | 01/06/26 | | Impressive kitchen | 01/06/26 | | Hairless community account | 01/06/26 | | rusted lascivious hunting ground | 01/06/26 | | Up-to-no-good Candlestick Maker | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Twisted chest-beating hell national security agency
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310880",#49568134) |
|
|