\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
Hairraiser cordovan immigrant
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
Lilac Aromatic Theater Stage Useless Brakes
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
Hairraiser cordovan immigrant
  11/29/25
...
Charismatic people who are hurt
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
Flickering abode
  11/29/25
lol jfc
Hairraiser cordovan immigrant
  11/29/25
...
Thriller Judgmental Sanctuary
  11/29/25
wow
insane toaster principal's office
  12/07/25
lmao
twisted corner
  12/07/25
...
Thriller Judgmental Sanctuary
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
insane toaster principal's office
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
shivering round eye forum
  12/07/25
Mental illness
Onyx Orchestra Pit
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
Anal avocado church nibblets
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
Lilac Aromatic Theater Stage Useless Brakes
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
Spectacular senate ratface
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
Charismatic people who are hurt
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: Hairraiser cordovan immigrant

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: Lilac Aromatic Theater Stage Useless Brakes

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: Hairraiser cordovan immigrant

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: Charismatic people who are hurt



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: Flickering abode

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: Hairraiser cordovan immigrant

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: Thriller Judgmental Sanctuary



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: insane toaster principal's office

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: twisted corner

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: Thriller Judgmental Sanctuary



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: insane toaster principal's office

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: shivering round eye forum

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: Onyx Orchestra Pit

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: Anal avocado church nibblets

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: Lilac Aromatic Theater Stage Useless Brakes

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: Spectacular senate ratface

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: Charismatic people who are hurt

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49527743)