The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| High-end Party Of The First Part | 01/06/26 | | Smoky Circlehead | 01/06/26 | | Diverse giraffe | 01/06/26 | | Smoky Circlehead | 01/06/26 | | Diverse giraffe | 01/06/26 | | Smoky Circlehead | 01/06/26 | | High-end Party Of The First Part | 01/06/26 | | Smoky Circlehead | 01/06/26 | | High-end Party Of The First Part | 01/06/26 | | blue brunch | 01/07/26 | | Dark stead | 01/06/26 | | lilac prole | 01/06/26 | | Diverse giraffe | 01/06/26 | | crusty trip theatre juggernaut | 01/06/26 | | Diverse giraffe | 01/06/26 | | Heady aqua national gaming laptop | 01/06/26 | | Vermilion vigorous house | 01/06/26 | | Stimulating erotic whorehouse | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Smoky Circlehead
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49568134) |
|
|