\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
balding partner
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
Ruby Ladyboy Pozpig
  12/08/25
You know how
Glittery hall idiot
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
balding partner
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
Crystalline Narrow-minded Shrine
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
balding partner
  12/08/25
...
Crystalline Narrow-minded Shrine
  12/08/25
180
adventurous maniacal corn cake
  12/09/25
...
Floppy azn native
  12/09/25
correct
offensive vibrant university
  12/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: balding partner

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Ruby Ladyboy Pozpig

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Glittery hall idiot

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: balding partner

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: Crystalline Narrow-minded Shrine

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: balding partner

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: Crystalline Narrow-minded Shrine



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: adventurous maniacal corn cake

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: Floppy azn native



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: offensive vibrant university

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310893#49495777)