i don't know who you are, HATP? if so maybe half scumbag

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50053643)

Not sure what I was in hs. Genre defying. I had 1 friend in every clique but belonged to No Group. They called me the antisocial social butterfly. Beloved by many, reciprocated to none. All my best friends and gfs went to other high schools because I didn't get on much with my hometown. Hometown was a wealthy elite lib enclave full of hideous JAPs and fingerwagging blue hairs. Whole town fetishized gay men. I slummed it with blue collars and nons from shittier towns. I should have been a dirtbag but parents had too much money. I was Too Poor to vacation with RSF type heirs (hence the obvious resentment) but my house was too big to be relatable to the Middle Class. I have long identified with Don Quixote who in the story was a Hidalgo, basically a poor nobleman. Inheritor of Land but not so much land that it could generate enough money to live large. Think turbo UMC but never UHNW. This is because my Dad hated being a Partner so he rejected equity and was like just pay me in cash I don't really care. I think on some level he never wanted to be insanely rich. Weird mental hangup about massive wealth.

Doubt I fit into any of cg's Cliques.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50053586)

I have a similar background btw, and identify as a Loser. I hung out with a mix of Preps and Losers (no nerds) in hs with maybe a few scumbags mixed in here and there. Most of them were either UMC or UC Liberals though.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50053652)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50053656)

Didn’t realize preps got a high as fuck gpa relative to gre/lsats. Maybe they get better grades automatically due to phenotype? I got a high as fuck gre and lsat relative to gpa but it was all downstream of loserdom (too lazy to go to class so got auto points off, handed stuff in late etc.). Isnt high tests scores more nerd-coded and atypical of Losers? Thought Losers got average test scores but were inexplicably good at writing speaking and learning foreign languages

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50053667)

a lot of times with GPA people try to talk their way out of it by claiming an Upward Trend. The Upward Trend is a subtle phenotype signal. smaller classes in upper level classes means more phenotype visibility. I had a Downward Trend.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50053749)

In Liberal Arts as a Loser of course u always got As on every paper but they’d dock me for phenotype using the “class participation” part of the grading rubric which is a way of reinforcing phenotype

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50053838)

Don’t try to date a Scumbagguette for example. She’ll eat you alive. Find the best Loser Woman you can.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50053927)

Loser Woman is your quiet frumpy co-worker who cleans up well at the Christmas party or when you take that important client out once a year. She’s not as attractive as the bartender but she actually gets the jokes of yours she pretends to laugh at.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890729&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#50054090)