\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

No one on xo has praised Trump or Vance since Friday

Remember when they said Vance would be the nominee in 2028?
Aromatic kink-friendly location
  02/02/26
...
Aromatic kink-friendly location
  02/02/26
im rooting for a vance potussy in a somewhat similar way to ...
contagious rigor station
  02/02/26
Unfortunately the rest of his household is more Indian than ...
Razzle-dazzle State Scourge Upon The Earth
  02/02/26
Vance will be fine once SCOTUS invokes the classic estoppel ...
light mildly autistic selfie windowlicker
  02/02/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 2nd, 2026 1:09 PM
Author: Aromatic kink-friendly location

Remember when they said Vance would be the nominee in 2028?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5830114&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#49641393)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 2nd, 2026 2:44 PM
Author: Aromatic kink-friendly location



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5830114&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#49641714)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 2nd, 2026 2:46 PM
Author: contagious rigor station

im rooting for a vance potussy in a somewhat similar way to how i rooted for slick willy in 92, and would have for nixon had i been alive.

its nice to see pure white trash ascend. i have no doubts about bill being intelligence as early as georgetown, or about vance and thiel, etc.

but its still affirming to see white trash maek it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5830114&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#49641719)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 2nd, 2026 2:56 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle State Scourge Upon The Earth

Unfortunately the rest of his household is more Indian than microsoft

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5830114&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#49641752)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 2nd, 2026 2:59 PM
Author: light mildly autistic selfie windowlicker

Vance will be fine once SCOTUS invokes the classic estoppel doctrine regarding lying teenagers behind held liable for contracts to indemnify the Epstein Clients of legal liability caused by lying teen prostitutes.

No one cared about teens lying about age to enlist in the military in WW1/WW2, they were held liable as were the teens that lied about age to get married. The Old Precedent is Coming Back the same way SCOTUS reempowered the Executive Branch with US vs. Trump!

*Epstein clients could still be sued civilly, but the suits will be conducted in the context of a classic adult harassment lawsuits, no heightened penalties due to minor status.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5830114&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310901#49641761)