The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| rough-skinned adventurous step-uncle's house | 01/06/26 | | fiercely-loyal disgusting stag film cuckold | 01/06/26 | | Motley foreskin | 01/06/26 | | fiercely-loyal disgusting stag film cuckold | 01/06/26 | | Motley foreskin | 01/06/26 | | fiercely-loyal disgusting stag film cuckold | 01/06/26 | | rough-skinned adventurous step-uncle's house | 01/06/26 | | fiercely-loyal disgusting stag film cuckold | 01/06/26 | | rough-skinned adventurous step-uncle's house | 01/06/26 | | fighting dull newt | 01/07/26 | | erotic sinister idea he suggested fat ankles | 01/06/26 | | lascivious frum nursing home pervert | 01/06/26 | | Motley foreskin | 01/06/26 | | Lime Reading Party Location | 01/06/26 | | Motley foreskin | 01/06/26 | | vigorous toilet seat depressive | 01/06/26 | | blue tanning salon | 01/06/26 | | Topaz judgmental police squad | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: fiercely-loyal disgusting stag film cuckold
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310904",#49568134) |
|
|