The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| vibrant gay patrolman | 01/06/26 | | ebony station | 01/06/26 | | Salmon curious laser beams | 01/06/26 | | ebony station | 01/06/26 | | Salmon curious laser beams | 01/06/26 | | ebony station | 01/06/26 | | vibrant gay patrolman | 01/06/26 | | ebony station | 01/06/26 | | vibrant gay patrolman | 01/06/26 | | Flirting Rehab | 01/07/26 | | comical doobsian black woman | 01/06/26 | | Obsidian Box Office Multi-billionaire | 01/06/26 | | Salmon curious laser beams | 01/06/26 | | wonderful sienna pistol | 01/06/26 | | Salmon curious laser beams | 01/06/26 | | filthy idiotic becky philosopher-king | 01/06/26 | | Racy red spot | 01/06/26 | | slimy generalized bond | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: ebony station
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310904#49568134) |
|
|