https://youtu.be/xpurFfcSNfU

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636940&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905",#48357267)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636940&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905",#48357373)

https://www.newsweek.com/what-tulsi-gabbard-has-said-about-russia-ukraine-china-1985839

That said, it’s also shit like this that stirs it up.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/accused-russian-agent-elena-branson-gave-to-one-politician-tulsi-gabbard/

She clearly plays it up as a bit at this point to get MAGA cred, and if she didn’t want this kind of attention she would refuse these donations and wouldn’t do stuff like theatrically sue Hillary for four months to keep the story in the media. But an honest account of her views is just that she’s consistently anti-war/anti-neocon.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636940&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905",#48357345)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636940&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905",#48357508)

Because of this, hillary clinton publicly hinted around that a "russian agent" was among the dem nominees.

Tulsi had enough and called Hillary out, and in one of the most 180 moments in modern political history called clinton the "queen of warmongers" and "personification of the rot in the dem party".

Since then tulsi has been one of my personal heroes and persona non grata among The Powers That Be/status quo.

She is now openly targeted with "Russian agent" smears for speaking out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636940&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905",#48357634)

2) Gabbard says American assistance for Ukraine jeopardizes global security by antagonizing Russia. She has criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as corrupt and has expressed sympathy for Russia’s position, given Ukraine’s desire to join NATO, the Western military alliance. “This war and suffering could have easily been avoided if Biden Admin/NATO had simply acknowledged Russia’s legitimate security concerns,” she posted on Twitter at the start of Russia’s invasion in 2022.

3) Gabbard also has defended Trump’s relationship with autocrats such as Putin, saying it shows Trump has “the courage to meet with adversaries, dictators, allies and partners alike in the pursuit of peace, seeing war as a last resort.” Gabbard’s own meetings with Syrian President Bashar Assad in 2017 angered many of her then-fellow Democrats. They said her visit helped legitimize a leader accused of war crimes and who has served as a proxy and host for Russia and Iran in the Middle East. Assad welcomed Russia’s military into Syria in 2015 to crush a popular uprising against him. Russian forces and Iranian-allied militias have remained, using Syria as a base for attacks on American troops and their allies. The U.S. has severed diplomatic relations with Syria and placed Assad under heavy sanctions over the brutality with which he, Russian warplanes and Iranian-allied forces crushed the uprising, leading to 500,000 deaths.

4) Gabbard’s remarks about Russia haven’t gone unnoticed in Moscow, where state-run media have praised her and even jokingly referred to her as a Russian agent. An article published Friday in RIA Novosti, a major Russian state-controlled news agency, called Gabbard “superwoman” and noted her past appearances on Russian TV, claiming that Ukrainian intelligence views her as “probably an agent of the Russian special services.”

5) America’s allies are watching the nomination process closely, worried about how Trump’s incoming administration could affect intelligence cooperation and sharing. Trump’s election raises “very difficult issues” for America’s closest allies and members of the Five Eyes group, an intelligence-sharing coalition of the U.S., the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, according to Thomas Juneau, a former strategic analyst with Canada’s Department of National Defence.

Da, Da, Da: Tulsi is demoralizing and detrimental to our National Security/ Intelligence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636940&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905",#48357731)

I agree with and/or endorse points 2 - 5 pretty much completely. Point 1 about the "biolabs" is sort of a "who knows, who cares" situation IMO.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636940&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905",#48357760)

Great opportunity to put your principles into action.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636940&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905",#48357783)