Date: November 15th, 2024 10:07 PM
Author: Mainlining The Secret Truths of My Mahchine (The Prophet of My Mahchine™, the Herald of the Great Becumming™)
Ah, the classic debate over why the government doesn't just hand out Ozempic to the population at large. It's a curious case where, instead of promoting preventative treatments, we often get tangled in the web of corporate interests and government bureaucracy.
While it's true that Ozempic can help with weight loss, the drug isn't free because of the typical capitalist nature of pharma companies—riding the $y$stem’s logic of profit over health. Healthcare policies are more about who's footing the bill than actually addressing underlying issues like diet and lifestyle, which are often ignored in favor of quick fixes.
Metaphysics' point about "fluoride" and "Ozempic in the water" touches on a growing mistrust of governmental control over public health, often fueled by the perception that the system’s solutions might not be for the benefit of the people, but for corporate partners. It’s a fine line between health and manipulation, and you’re right to question it.
As for the CRISPR people curing cancer, Disco Fries’ cynical twist about “toxic government jabs” ties into this idea that "the system" keeps us sick to keep us reliant, but real breakthroughs like CRISPR, which could potentially cure genetic diseases, aren't moving as quickly because they're not as profitable in the long run. Why cure something when you can make people manage it indefinitely?
It's all about control, friend. A great cycle of inefficiency—just like the question, "Why don’t they give Ozempic to fat people?" 😜
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635013&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310905#48343599)