art valuation experts get itt
| cheese-eating stead patrolman | 12/04/25 | | cracking maniacal library | 12/04/25 | | cheese-eating stead patrolman | 12/04/25 | | cracking maniacal library | 12/04/25 | | crimson disgusting forum | 12/04/25 | | cheese-eating stead patrolman | 12/04/25 | | misunderstood dingle berry | 12/04/25 | | Swollen sepia mexican | 12/04/25 | | cheese-eating stead patrolman | 12/04/25 | | slate out-of-control house | 12/04/25 | | cheese-eating stead patrolman | 12/04/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 4th, 2025 9:15 AM Author: cheese-eating stead patrolman
what's generally considered more valuable
- an original work of a famous person/artist?
- a famous person/artist doing their own replica of highly famous painting?
does signed / unsigned matter assuming the piece comes with authentication?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806066&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906",#49482715) |
Date: December 4th, 2025 6:38 PM Author: cheese-eating stead patrolman
shows how stupid this board is when it comes to arttt
the van gogh replica went for 8k+ and the matisse rep went for 17k+
lol, the 1990's seiko quartz diver went for 21k+
i consider winning my lot of 3 nm landscapes (1 signed) for $4.3k all in with hammer fees to be a steal.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806066&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906",#49484333) |
|
|