The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Rose public bath | 01/06/26 | | internet-worthy piazza | 01/06/26 | | blathering harsh toaster | 01/06/26 | | internet-worthy piazza | 01/06/26 | | blathering harsh toaster | 01/06/26 | | internet-worthy piazza | 01/06/26 | | Rose public bath | 01/06/26 | | internet-worthy piazza | 01/06/26 | | Rose public bath | 01/06/26 | | Insanely creepy boistinker lay | 01/07/26 | | Talented Rebellious Pisswyrm Immigrant | 01/06/26 | | Cerebral foreskin | 01/06/26 | | blathering harsh toaster | 01/06/26 | | passionate shitlib fanboi | 01/06/26 | | blathering harsh toaster | 01/06/26 | | yapping lascivious locus dragon | 01/06/26 | | self-centered lodge | 01/06/26 | | Thriller Genital Piercing Voyeur | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: internet-worthy piazza
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906",#49568134) |
|
|