\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
Vibrant Brindle Step-uncle's House
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
disgusting indirect expression laser beams
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
Vibrant Brindle Step-uncle's House
  11/29/25
...
Razzle striped hyena
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
crusty swashbuckling windowlicker
  11/29/25
lol jfc
Vibrant Brindle Step-uncle's House
  11/29/25
...
electric indian lodge masturbator
  11/29/25
wow
Impertinent Green Alpha
  12/07/25
lmao
twinkling vivacious sandwich theatre
  12/07/25
...
electric indian lodge masturbator
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
Impertinent Green Alpha
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
Excitant Ticket Booth Boistinker
  12/07/25
Mental illness
Confused lascivious gaming laptop foreskin
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
Startling filthpig dragon
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
disgusting indirect expression laser beams
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
duck-like chrome fortuitous meteor famous landscape painting
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
Razzle striped hyena
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: Vibrant Brindle Step-uncle's House

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: disgusting indirect expression laser beams

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: Vibrant Brindle Step-uncle's House

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: Razzle striped hyena



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: crusty swashbuckling windowlicker

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: Vibrant Brindle Step-uncle's House

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: electric indian lodge masturbator



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Impertinent Green Alpha

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: twinkling vivacious sandwich theatre

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: electric indian lodge masturbator



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: Impertinent Green Alpha

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: Excitant Ticket Booth Boistinker

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: Confused lascivious gaming laptop foreskin

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: Startling filthpig dragon

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: disgusting indirect expression laser beams

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: duck-like chrome fortuitous meteor famous landscape painting

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: Razzle striped hyena

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49527743)