Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?
| trip deep sound barrier university | 12/06/25 | | vengeful theatre rigor | 12/06/25 | | ruby corner feces | 12/06/25 | | vengeful theatre rigor | 12/06/25 | | contagious cocky bawdyhouse newt | 12/06/25 | | Fishy abode | 12/06/25 | | trip deep sound barrier university | 12/06/25 | | Fishy abode | 12/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle queen of the night | 12/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle queen of the night | 12/06/25 | | Bonkers sweet tailpipe | 12/06/25 | | ruby corner feces | 12/06/25 | | vengeful theatre rigor | 12/06/25 | | floppy meetinghouse | 12/06/25 | | Fishy abode | 12/06/25 | | floppy meetinghouse | 12/06/25 | | Fishy abode | 12/07/25 | | floppy meetinghouse | 12/07/25 | | diverse opaque theater stage gaping | 12/06/25 | | Godawful Cerise Twinkling Uncleanness Trailer Park | 12/06/25 | | vengeful theatre rigor | 12/06/25 | | violent church building | 12/06/25 | | Black offensive kitchen | 12/06/25 | | Fishy abode | 12/06/25 | | trip deep sound barrier university | 12/06/25 | | Free-loading sneaky criminal | 12/06/25 | | Gaped silver resort partner | 12/06/25 | | trip deep sound barrier university | 12/06/25 | | Spectacular Puce Hell | 12/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM Author: Fishy abode
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."
there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.
tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49488562) |
|
|