The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
All of you Tesla FSD people are insane
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 17th, 2026 11:44 AM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. https://x.com/foxnews/status/2033891478494171637?s=46
makes sense why Elon is pulling Tesla completely out of the consumer vehicle market |
 |
Date: March 17th, 2026 11:47 AM Author: Darnell we really need to make lawsuits against companies in proportion to their market cap (or an estimate for private companies) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49750846) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:21 PM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. fortunately for Tesla’s this woman lives in Texas where punitive damages are capped at $50 bucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49750952) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:24 PM Author: lib quotemo = literally WLMAS = dumb nigger 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 2:22 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Did this sentence sound really smart in your head when you were typing it up? |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:24 PM Author: lib quotemo = literally WLMAS = dumb nigger 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:06 PM Author: .,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,...,:,..;,.., Why does Gavin Newsome want to force everyone in CA to drive these deathtraps?
Governor Newsom Announces California Will Phase Out Gasoline-Powered Cars & Drastically Reduce Demand for Fossil Fuel in California’s Fight Against Climate Change Executive order directs state to require that, by 2035, all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California be zero-emission vehicles
Transportation currently accounts for more than 50 percent of California’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Zero-emission vehicles are a key part of California’s clean, innovation economy – already California’s second largest global export market
Order also directs the state to take more actions to tackle the dirtiest oil extraction and support workers and job retention and creation as we make a just transition away from fossil fuels
SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced that he will aggressively move the state further away from its reliance on climate change-causing fossil fuels while retaining and creating jobs and spurring economic growth – he issued an executive order requiring sales of all new passenger vehicles to be zero-emission by 2035 and additional measures to eliminate harmful emissions from the transportation sector.
The transportation sector is responsible for more than half of all of California’s carbon pollution, 80 percent of smog-forming pollution and 95 percent of toxic diesel emissions – all while communities in the Los Angeles Basin and Central Valley see some of the dirtiest and most toxic air in the country.
“This is the most impactful step our state can take to fight climate change,” said Governor Newsom. “For too many decades, we have allowed cars to pollute the air that our children and families breathe. Californians shouldn’t have to worry if our cars are giving our kids asthma. Our cars shouldn’t make wildfires worse – and create more days filled with smoky air. Cars shouldn’t melt glaciers or raise sea levels threatening our cherished beaches and coastlines.”
Following the order, the California Air Resources Board will develop regulations to mandate that 100 percent of in-state sales of new passenger cars and trucks are zero-emission by 2035 – a target which would achieve more than a 35 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and an 80 percent improvement in oxides of nitrogen emissions from cars statewide. In addition, the Air Resources Board will develop regulations to mandate that all operations of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles shall be 100 percent zero emission by 2045 where feasible, with the mandate going into effect by 2035 for drayage trucks. To ensure needed infrastructure to support zero-emission vehicles, the order requires state agencies, in partnership with the private sector, to accelerate deployment of affordable fueling and charging options. It also requires support of new and used zero-emission vehicle markets to provide broad accessibility to zero-emission vehicles for all Californians. The executive order will not prevent Californians from owning gasoline-powered cars or selling them on the used car market.
California will be leading the nation in this effort – joining 15 countries that have already committed to phase out gasoline-powered cars and using our market power to push zero-emission vehicle innovation and drive down costs for everyone.
By the time the new rule goes into effect, zero-emission vehicles will almost certainly be cheaper and better than the traditional fossil fuel powered cars. The upfront cost of electric vehicles are projected to reach parity with conventional vehicles in just a matter of years, and the cost of owning the car – both in maintenance and how much it costs to power the car mile for mile – is far less than a fossil fuel burning vehicle.
The executive order sets clear deliverables for new health and safety regulations that protect workers and communities from the impacts of oil extraction. It supports companies who transition their upstream and downstream oil production operations to cleaner alternatives. It also directs the state to make sure taxpayers are not stuck with the bill to safely close and remediate former oil fields. To protect the health and safety of our communities and workers, the Governor is also asking the Legislature to end the issuance of new hydraulic fracturing permits by 2024.
The executive order directs state agencies to develop strategies for an integrated, statewide rail and transit network, and incorporate safe and accessible infrastructure into projects to support bicycle and pedestrian options, particularly in low-income and disadvantaged communities.
Click here to read the text of EXECUTIVE ORDER N-79-20 (PDF).
This action continues the Governor’s commitment to strengthening California’s resilience while lowering carbon emissions – essential to meeting California’s air quality and climate goals. In the last six months alone, the California Air Resources Board has approved new regulations requiring truck manufacturers to transition to electric zero-emission trucks beginning in 2024 and the Governor signed an MOU with 14 other states to advance and accelerate the market for electric medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Last fall, California led a multi-state coalition in filing a lawsuit challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s attempt to revoke portions of a 2013 waiver that allows the state to implement its Advanced Clean Car Standards.
Last September, Governor Newsom took action to leverage the state’s transportation systems and purchasing power to strengthen climate mitigation and resiliency and to measure and manage climate risks across the state’s $700 billion pension investments. To mitigate climate threats to our communities and increase carbon sequestration, the Governor invested in forest health and fuel reduction and held utilities accountable for building resiliency. The Governor also directed state agencies to develop a comprehensive strategy to build a climate-resilient water system and made a historic investment to develop the workforce for California’s future carbon-neutral economy.
https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/09/23/governor-newsom-announces-california-will-phase-out-gasoline-powered-cars-drastically-reduce-demand-for-fossil-fuel-in-californias-fight-against-climate-change/ |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:08 PM Author: Darnell are you confused or dishonest?
the article and regulation doesn't mention driving automation at all. it's about electric cars |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:11 PM Author: .,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,...,:,..;,.., Who do you think is going to be selling those electric cars?
Electric Vehicle Sales and Market Share (US – 2026 Updates)
Justin Fischer Last updated Feb 17, 2026 Key Takeaways Q4 2025 EV market share numbers reflect the drop in buyers following the expiration of federal incentives. The only brands with year-over-year gains were Cadillac, Volvo, Jeep, and Lucid. Tesla’s EV market share climbed from 41% in Q3 to 59% in Q4. In 2026, uncertainty is the name of the game when it comes to EV sales in the United States.
https://caredge.com/guides/electric-vehicle-market-share-and-sales |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:14 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
LMAO
Hey brother want to go Google whether Tesla's market share (btw they exclusively make EVs) of new EVs sold in America is going up or down within the EV space? (Here I'll save you the trouble, the answer is "it's going up and it's currently tied once again with the previous all-time watermark at ~61% market dominance.")
In almost 2/3 of cases, "I bought an EV" and "I bought a Tesla" are literally synonyms. Pretty sure Gavin Newsome is aware of that. |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:11 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Wow, this seems like the end IMO.
Obviously this is totally representative of this insanely statistically unsafe "product" (which is why insurance companies are now refusing to cover FSD use or jacking rates way up for it), cat's out of the bag now it's over.
How long do you think it takes for Tesla to spiral into bankruptcy? Probably a year or two at most? Wanna place a bet on it? :) |
Date: March 17th, 2026 11:46 AM Author: Nude Karlstack (🧐) Only a million? XO Scumbags could definitely extract in the tens of millions here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49750842) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 11:48 AM Author: woah (hitler did nothing wrong) it's a woman driver problem not a Tesla problem. They don't "get" how to use it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49750852) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:00 PM Author: Fucking Fuckface I really wish our jurisprudence had a greater emphasis on the concept of assumption of risk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49750878) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:20 PM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. you sure do assume the risk when you market a technology as full self driving when it isn’t (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49750944) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:24 PM Author: lib quotemo = literally WLMAS = dumb nigger 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:36 PM Author: ...,....,,........ 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49751009) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:38 PM Author: peeface everything about it stresses that it is a driving aid and that you need to keep your hands on the wheel, eyes on the road, feet on the pedals, and ready to take full control at a moments notice.
|
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:40 PM Author: Darnell >ready to take full control at a moments notice
which is not possible for anyone who bothers to study human psychology for more than a nanosecond |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:47 PM Author: peeface yes the human is obviously the weak link here
|
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:51 PM Author: Darnell the responsible party is the company that designs a system incompatible with humans.
we should bill them 0.5% of their market cap. only 200 accidents and tesla is liquidated. with such regulation, tesla will be incentivized to solve the problem long before they are fined out of business |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:55 PM Author: Fucking Fuckface I drove all across Wyoming and Montana in a rental Kia of all things that had steering and accel/decel capabilities. I did just fine taking control when needed
Why do you think people can't pay as much attention as is needed to be the one actually driving (when we already know the act of driving is not beyond the limits of human psychology)? |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:03 PM Author: Darnell it's kind of embarrassing for you to ask a question like this. if you don't need to consistently provide input and get feedback from a system (both physically and mentally) a significant percentage of people will at some point not be paying attention closely enough to take control when needed. there are hundreds of studies in psychology, human factors, engineering, and other areas of literature going back to the invention of cruise control.
it's funny you mention wyoming. the highway to heaven on i-80 is incredibly dangerous because it's so straight for so long that even prior to self-driving features, people would often zone out and lose control or crash. (high winds are another factor.)
edit: also, the fact that you took control successfully is like saying "i don't need to wear a seat belt. i drive safely most of the time". your ability to navigate a dangerous situation successfully doesn't make it less dangerous. and it doesn't absolve the company that designs and (falsely) advertises such a system. |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:34 PM Author: Fucking Fuckface You: companies shouldn't be absolved from foreseeable harms their conduct creates.
Also you: people should be absolved from foreseeable harms their conduct creates.
I'll admit to engaging in a bit of fun sophistry, but I don't even own a Tesla and have seen for years that FSD requires constant oversight
EDIT: Wow, just saw your message above about putting TSLA out of business over 200 accidents. LMAO if serious |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 2:21 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Serious People: "We are serious people who know what we're talking about and deserve to be taken very seriously on this subject."
Also Serious People: "I'll just be blunt -- Tesla should probably just be fined out of business at this point, straight up. I mean holy shit, they have so many accidents! (Please ignore the fact that an overwhelming % of those 'accidents' basically boil down to the car slow rolling into a pole in a parking lot at 5 mph and denting its bumper without injuring anyone, that's totally irrelevant to this important discussion about how these things are death traps which are fundamentally incompatible with human life, and -- why yes, I'm totally in favor of allowing women to continue to legally drive on public roads... what does that have to do with this topic???)"
Lmao indeed. |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:53 PM Author: Fucking Fuckface I'm curious: if we know people zone out even without FSD capabilities and crash, shouldn't all such accidents result in massive fines for automakers that fail to institute systems to keep drivers actively engaged?
Or is there a point at which we place the onus on the operator of virtually anything to be the ultimate responsible party? |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 2:25 PM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Brother you need to stop asking these inconvenient questions, the bottom line here is that Elon Musk is EVIL and Tesla is A BAD COMPANY and its so-called "FSD" is actually A SHITTY PIECE OF MOSTLY-FAKE DEATH-TRAP TECHNOLOGY, OK? |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:46 PM Author: Fucking Fuckface You don't think it was in control of steering, braking, acceleration, and all other aspects of driving right into that pole? Where's the false marketing? If it wasn't in full control, then you're admitting the woman driver is to blame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49751049) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:24 PM Author: lib quotemo = literally WLMAS = dumb nigger 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 12:36 PM Author: ...,....,,........ *Only* $1,000,000?
Seems pretty low.
But more importantly, is this what we should expect from a company valued at $1T?? |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:06 PM Author: Brussels Sprout: Brussels,Helsinki,Stockholm,Kyiv I wish I could afford a Tesla X, willing to assume the risk of flawed self driving which is known to degrade in rainy and snowy conditions (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49751136) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2026 1:12 PM Author: Gay of Hormuz Recommend watching video while listening to No Doubt - Just a Girl (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846767&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49751160) |