Why are the goyim buying gold and silver?
| Stirring Business Firm Legal Warrant | 01/29/26 | | Stirring Business Firm Legal Warrant | 01/29/26 | | bronze newt | 01/29/26 | | Stirring Business Firm Legal Warrant | 01/29/26 | | Adventurous gunner immigrant | 01/29/26 | | bronze newt | 01/29/26 | | Fragrant Flirting Dragon Internal Respiration | 01/29/26 | | Stirring Business Firm Legal Warrant | 01/29/26 | | bronze newt | 01/29/26 | | Adventurous gunner immigrant | 01/29/26 | | bronze newt | 01/29/26 | | Adventurous gunner immigrant | 01/29/26 | | bronze newt | 01/29/26 | | Adventurous gunner immigrant | 01/29/26 | | bronze newt | 01/29/26 | | Adventurous gunner immigrant | 01/29/26 | | bronze newt | 01/29/26 | | Adventurous gunner immigrant | 01/29/26 | | Stirring Business Firm Legal Warrant | 01/29/26 | | Light misanthropic ratface | 01/29/26 | | pink parlour | 01/29/26 | | Stirring Business Firm Legal Warrant | 01/30/26 | | Fragrant Flirting Dragon Internal Respiration | 01/30/26 | | pink parlour | 01/30/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 29th, 2026 5:02 PM Author: Adventurous gunner immigrant
this is also irrelevant.
if i said "if a stock is going to collapse, shorting as much of it as you can is a good idea" would it be intelligent to respond "yes, but you must know when it'll collapse"? well no shit! in the long run we're all dead and the sun goes supernova. it is certain that one day the dollar will be worth nothing and cease to exist, i can guarantee that!
none of that changes that fact that borrowing something that losses value in real terms it is a good for the borrower as an ironclad principle.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828364&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49631364) |
 |
Date: January 29th, 2026 5:12 PM Author: Adventurous gunner immigrant
*IF* the dollar is going to collapse, having debt would be tcr.
but what if it doesn't collapse?
then it's *NOT* tcr!
if i said "if something is going to appreciate it's a good to own it" you wouldn't quibble with these obvious variables. that's a just a true statement. yes, if owning it required you to take out debt that accrued faster than the asset appreciated, then it wouldn't be good! that doesn't make the statement any less true. likewise, "if something is going to depreciate it it's a good thing to have borrowed it", pointing out that if the cost of the borrowing exceeds the depreciation doesn't make that statement untrue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828364&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49631383) |
 |
Date: January 29th, 2026 5:23 PM Author: Adventurous gunner immigrant
yes i did, which is essentially "no shit but that doesn't change the principle."
"buying something that goes up in value is a good for the buyer."
"but what if he borrowed money to buy it that accrued interest faster than it appreciated."
"then it would be bad, but that doesn't change the general principle, you're talking about other costs."
***
"borrowing something that goes down in value is good for the borrower."
"but what if the cost of borrowing exceeds the favorable debt to value gains?"
"then it would be bad, but that doesn't change the general principle, you're talking about other costs."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828364&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310906#49631400) |
|
|